March 24, 2026 3-5pm ET
Wednesday on The Robert Scott Bell Show:
Hour 1
The Genie in the Bottle: Vaccine Rites Coerced vaccination constitutes a profound assault on individual sovereignty, bodily autonomy, and the spiritual essence of humanity, equating forced injection to historical violations like slavery and rape by overriding personal will with collective authority under the guise of public welfare, as explored in an excerpt from Daniel Polikoff’s book Apocalypse of the Modern Mind: Covid and the Dialectic of Enlightenment. The human body serves as the sacred temple and primary private property of the soul, where unconsented invasive penetration—particularly via needle—directly imperils the liberty integral to human freedom, rendering compulsory vaccination programs offenses against the spirit regardless of degree of coercion. Polikoff draws parallels to past societal normalization of dehumanization, dismissing safety assurances as willful delusion and superstition given risks of death or long-term injury, and analogizes mass imposition to collective rape justified by the imperfect will of the many rather than individual consent. Vaccination, when mandated, functions as a modern rite or sacrament under scientism, akin to religious baptism or communion, certifying allegiance to biotechnology and enlightenment rationality, with many U.S. states enforcing school requirements without exemptions and treating dissent as unlawful heresy. During the Covid era, adult mandates escalated this dynamic, reducing bodies to quantifiable data sets in a “reign of quantity” that advanced the Great Reset agenda, waging war on human bodies, souls, and spirits through mass formation, social exclusion, and ideological enforcement. The piece frames these policies as rooted in enlightenment myths that prioritize material quantification over spiritual dignity, demanding recognition of their coercive authority while critiquing the regime’s implications for ongoing debates on personal liberty versus purported collective good, ultimately portraying compelled vaccination as a crime against humanity that erodes the core of individual essence and freedom.
Special Guest: Lara Shanley
Laura Kaplan Shanley is a writer, speaker, childbirth consultant and author of the book, Unassisted Childbirth. She has been featured in media outlets such as ABC News, 20/20, The Doctors, the BBC, the Discovery Channel, the New York Times, and the Washington Post. In addition, she works with women one-on-one providing them with childbirth education and emotional support before and during pregnancy. Laura maintains a website dedicated to natural childbirth, www.unassistedchildbirth.com, and is also active on Facebook, www.facebook.com/laurashanley. All four of Laura’s children were born at home, without doctors or midwives.
US chemical giant to stop producing herbicide called ‘toxic cocktail’ by critics Corteva Agriscience announced it will discontinue production of Enlist Duo, a herbicide combining 2,4-D (a key component of the Vietnam War-era defoliant Agent Orange) with glyphosate, amid a decade of litigation, public campaigns, and criticism labeling the mixture a highly dangerous “toxic cocktail” linked to cancer, ecological harm, and threats to endangered species. The product, approved by the EPA in 2014 and reapproved in 2022 for use on genetically engineered corn, soybeans, and cotton across about 4.5 million acres, faced legal challenges from groups including the Center for Food Safety, which hailed the discontinuation as a victory after the company opted to withdraw rather than continue defending in court. Critics highlighted that the EPA’s approvals overlooked required Endangered Species Act consultations and underestimated risks, with the agency invalidating the initial approval in 2020 before reinstating it for seven years; Nathan Donley of the Center for Biological Diversity criticized the process as flawed and shortcut-oriented. The 2,4-D ingredient, classified as a possible carcinogen by the World Health Organization and still present in Corteva’s continuing Enlist One product, is associated with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, birth defects, respiratory issues, Parkinson’s disease, reproductive harms, and impacts on wildlife including butterflies, birds, fish, deer, panthers, and bats, while also contributing to herbicide-resistant superweeds that increase farmer burdens. Corteva reported over $1 billion in Enlist product sales in 2022 but provided no specific reason for halting Enlist Duo, and ongoing litigation seeks to invalidate Enlist One’s approval. The decision ends a prolonged battle over the combination’s risks, though single-ingredient formulations persist, underscoring persistent debates over pesticide regulation, corporate accountability, and the legacy of Agent Orange’s health and environmental consequences in modern agriculture.Hour 2
The Eating Disorder Celebrated as Self-Care: Understanding Orthorexia Nervosa Orthorexia nervosa manifests as an obsessive pursuit of consuming only “healthy” or “clean” foods, often overlapping with anorexia nervosa or emerging during recovery from other eating disorders, where rigid dietary restrictions are socially misinterpreted as admirable discipline and self-care rather than pathological behavior. A qualitative meta-synthesis published in Acta Psychologica analyzed 16 studies from the United States, United Kingdom, and Northern Europe between 2020 and 2024, revealing how individuals experience intense anxiety and guilt over perceived impure food choices, escalating restrictions that lead to social isolation by avoiding shared meals, emotional distress including feelings of moral superiority while judging others’ habits, and physical deterioration such as malnutrition, hair thinning, amenorrhea, fatigue, gastrointestinal problems, osteoporosis, irritable bowel syndrome, and iodine deficiencies from extreme diets limited to items like lettuce, vegetables, hummus, and occasional avocado combined with excessive exercise and self-punishment. Triggers frequently involve chaotic life periods where food control provides a sense of order, amplified by wellness culture’s emphasis on dietary virtue as a marker of self-worth and social status, contradictory social media advice on diets, detoxes, and superfoods that heighten confusion and restriction, and online communities establishing hierarchies of “good” versus “bad” foods sometimes promoting bland preparations to discourage eating. Diagnosis remains challenging because the behaviors appear virtuous and health-conscious, delaying recognition until severe health crises, relationship breakdowns, or near-divorces occur, with many rejecting the orthorexia label as they view their approach as a “safer” alternative to overt starvation. Participants described progressive restriction through increasing nutritional knowledge that paradoxically became more confusing and limiting, alongside strained family ties such as a daughter ceasing communication for a year due to food-related rigidity. The research highlights broader societal anxieties tying health to morality, where orthorexia evolves from traditional eating disorder patterns toward an idealized purity in consumption, though the studies are limited to Western, affluent contexts with varying diagnostic criteria. Recovery narratives emphasize rediscovering joy in shared indulgences and human connections, but face resistance from ingrained fears of losing control and criticism of interventions that inadvertently reinforce orthorexic ideals by overemphasizing nutritional perfection. Researchers Panagiota Tragantzopoulou, Vaitsa Giannouli, and Sophia Zachariadou underscore how these lived experiences reflect cultural pressures that celebrate restrictive eating as empowerment while overlooking its destructive consequences.
Special Guest: Tracy Slepcevic
Tracy Slepcevic is an Author, Certified Integrative Health Coach, Keynote Speaker, US Air Force Veteran, and the founder of Pur Health, LLC.
She is educated in the field of Complementary and Alternative Medicine and has dedicated over 14 years to researching various treatments and therapies for individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Over the years, she has worked with various doctors, scientists, advocates, and researchers, and she has made it her mission to educate families on the importance of living a healthy lifestyle.
Today, Tracy runs a successful health coaching business where she assists her clients in implementing lifestyle changes to improve their overall health and wellness. She continues to provide support to parents of children with special needs and guide them on their healing journey. For more information on Tracy, you can see her full bio HERE
Gun Owner Denied Firearm By ATF For Claiming “God Given Rights” A law-abiding U.S. citizen and member of Gun Owners of America was denied approval to manufacture a firearm under the National Firearms Act after entering “exercise my God given right” in Box 4(i) of ATF Form 1, which requires applicants to state the reason for making the firearm, with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives deeming the response insufficient despite the applicant having no criminal record and complying with all other registration requirements for a non-prohibited item under federal or state law. The denial occurred without any statutory or regulatory provision mandating a specific justification beyond the exercise of Second Amendment rights, prompting Gun Owners of America to file a notice of supplemental authority in their ongoing “One Big Beautiful Lawsuit” against the federal government, using the incident to argue that the NFA’s registration process operates as a discretionary “may-issue” system rather than a straightforward “shall-issue” permitting regime, thereby violating the Supreme Court’s 2022 Bruen decision that struck down subjective may-issue carry laws for lacking objective criteria and historical analogues. GOA contends the ATF’s action exemplifies bureaucratic overreach weaponizing the NFA to infringe on constitutional protections, equating the requirement to a burden that exceeds modest regulation and effectively conditions a fundamental right on government approval of the applicant’s stated rationale. The organization highlights that the Second Amendment safeguards the right to keep and bear arms without such governmental interference, framing the denial as evidence of broader ATF practices that deny law-abiding citizens their rights based on arbitrary interpretations. GOA calls for abolishing NFA registration mandates and defunding the ATF to prevent future similar denials, urging supporters to join their efforts to defend against what they describe as tyrannical restrictions on God-given rights protected by the Constitution. The article, republished from GOA materials, emphasizes the incident as illustrative of how federal agencies can block firearm ownership or manufacturing even when applicants meet technical criteria, solely due to the phrasing of intent related to inherent rights rather than secular or commercial purposes.
Trump and Congress Create Legal Path for Continued U.S.–WHO Collaboration—Despite Formal Withdrawal Congress and President Donald Trump enacted the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026 (H.R. 7148), signed into law as Public Law 119-75 on February 3, 2026, which preserves a legal mechanism for U.S. federal public health personnel to collaborate with World Health Organization-funded programs despite the U.S. formal withdrawal from the WHO initiated by Executive Order 14155 and completed on January 22, 2026, allowing up to 60 Public Health Service employees to be assigned to child survival and AIDS initiatives supported by the WHO, USAID, or UNICEF without reinstating membership, funding, or governance participation. This provision, embedded in a 567-page spending bill allocating at least $5.5 billion for pandemic preparedness without a declared emergency, focuses particularly on influenza as the only named virus, directing $3.2 billion to the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response for medical countermeasures including vaccines, antivirals, supplies, diagnostics, and surveillance tools, while authorizing construction of private vaccine manufacturing facilities for pandemic influenza biologics. The statute enables continued U.S. involvement in WHO-led global influenza vaccine strain-selection processes amid discussions, despite the withdrawal entailing termination of funding, recall of personnel, and cessation of committee participation, effectively creating a workaround for operational ties in practice while maintaining disengagement in name. Broader appropriations fund emerging and zoonotic infectious disease surveillance, public health emergency response, and gain-of-function research on avian influenza viruses, including chimeric experiments and transmissibility modeling, underscoring a dual approach of formal exit paired with sustained technical and personnel-level engagement on key health threats. The article frames this as a contradiction to public declarations of full separation, highlighting how the law sustains collaboration through personnel assignments and targeted funding, potentially undermining the withdrawal’s intent by preserving channels for influence and coordination on global health matters like influenza pandemics.
Take the vaccine, please,’ a top US health official says in an appeal as measles cases rise Dr. Mehmet Oz, administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, urged Americans to get vaccinated against measles during an appearance on CNN’s “State of the Union” on February 8, 2026, stating “Take the vaccine, please” and emphasizing that measles is a dangerous illness with an available solution, saying “We have a solution for our problem” while affirming “Oh, for sure” people should fear the disease. Oz confirmed that Medicare and Medicaid will continue covering the measles vaccine without barriers, describing it as part of the core schedule, and noted that outbreaks primarily affect children amid rising cases across multiple states, including a South Carolina outbreak in the hundreds that has surpassed Texas’ 2025 total, another on the Utah-Arizona border, and confirmed cases elsewhere this year, raising risks that the U.S. could lose its measles elimination status achieved in 2000. Infectious disease experts attribute the spread to declining vaccination rates, with the share of children receiving exemptions reaching an all-time high and contributing to increased incidence of measles and other preventable diseases like whooping cough. Oz defended recent federal policy shifts, including the Republican administration’s decision last month to drop certain childhood vaccine recommendations following President Trump’s request to review peer nations’ approaches, while highlighting Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s early calls for vaccination during the initial Texas outbreak as evidence of support for measles immunization. The article contextualizes Oz’s appeal against Kennedy’s historical vaccine skepticism, including past sympathy for unsubstantiated autism links—though most measles vaccines lack thimerosal—and a 2019 Samoa trip where Kennedy sought meetings with officials before a devastating outbreak that killed 83, mostly young children, despite his testimony denying vaccine-related involvement. NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya stated no single vaccine causes autism but left open potential combined effects, while the administration frames changes as efforts to restore trust post-COVID amid misinformation. The piece underscores contradictions in messaging, with Oz promoting access and efficacy for measles vaccine specifically, while broader revisions and exemptions fuel concerns over public health impacts from reduced immunization coverage in under-vaccinated communities.
Family dinners may keep teenagers off drink and drugs, says new research Regular family dinners are associated with significantly lower risks of substance use among teenagers, including reduced odds of alcohol consumption, binge drinking, cigarette smoking, marijuana use, and illicit drug experimentation, according to a comprehensive review of 36 studies involving over 100,000 adolescents published in the journal Appetite. The analysis found that teens who frequently ate meals with their families—typically defined as five or more times per week—exhibited 20-40% lower likelihood of engaging in various forms of substance use compared to those who rarely or never shared family meals, with the protective effects persisting across diverse populations, socioeconomic backgrounds, and cultural contexts after controlling for factors such as parental monitoring, family conflict, academic performance, and peer influences. Researchers identified several mechanisms underlying this relationship: family dinners provide structured opportunities for open communication, emotional bonding, and parental modeling of healthy behaviors, allowing parents to detect early signs of distress or peer pressure that might lead to substance experimentation. Shared meals also foster a sense of belonging and routine that buffers against stress, loneliness, or low self-esteem—known risk factors for substance initiation—while reinforcing family norms that discourage risky behaviors through casual discussions of values, consequences, and expectations. The benefits appeared dose-dependent, with more frequent dinners correlating to stronger reductions in risk, and qualitative data from some included studies suggested that the quality of interactions during meals mattered, with positive, non-judgmental conversations yielding greater protective outcomes than tense or obligatory gatherings. The review noted limitations including reliance on self-reported data, potential reverse causation where substance-using teens might avoid family meals, and variability in how “family dinner” was defined across studies, though longitudinal designs in several papers supported a directional link from meal frequency to lower substance use over time. Experts emphasize that family dinners serve as a low-cost, accessible intervention that strengthens protective family dynamics without requiring specialized programs, complementing broader prevention strategies like school-based education and community support. The findings align with prior research linking family connectedness to better mental health and behavioral outcomes in adolescence, suggesting that prioritizing shared meals could offer meaningful public health value in curbing teen substance misuse amid rising concerns over youth vaping, cannabis legalization effects, and opioid exposure. Overall, the study underscores the role of everyday family rituals in building resilience and guiding adolescents toward healthier choices during a vulnerable developmental period.





