Nov 25, 2025 3-5pm ET
Tuesday on The Robert Scott Bell Show:
Hour 1
1 in 10 Adults Seriously Injured by a COVID Vaccine, New Survey Says The article reports that a national survey conducted in November 2025 by Rasmussen Reports found roughly 10 % of U.S. adults who received a COVID-19 vaccine reported experiencing what the authors describe as “major” side effects, and 36 % reported “minor” side effects. Based on an adult population estimate of 258 million, the article translates this into about 17 million individuals possibly suffering major effects and 63 million minor ones. It highlights comments from individuals such as Kristi Dobbs—who claims serious injury after one dose of Pfizer’s vaccine in 2021—and Christopher Dreisbach of React19, both suggesting their injuries went largely ignored by federal and regulatory agencies. The article also asserts under-reporting in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), citing 1,666,646 reports by August 2025—with over 220,000 serious enough to warrant hospitalization and nearly 39,000 deaths—and argues that VAERS traditionally captures only around 1 % of actual adverse events. It implicates additional regulatory failure: fewer than 0.3 % of over 13,000 claims filed with the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) had been compensated by June 2025. The author draws attention to what is characterized as agency and platform-level censorship, complaints that government health agencies told vaccine-injured persons they were “ignored” or “discarded,” and claims that occupational safety regulation under OSHA discouraged reporting of vaccine-related injuries. The tone is critical and urgent, positioning vaccine-injury recognition and compensation as a moral imperative. While the article acknowledges the survey’s margin of error (±3 percentage points) and a sample size of 1,292 adults, it does not present detailed reviewer-verified medical data tying the effects causally to vaccination.
Mass. officials rebuke ‘dangerous’ vaccine misinformation added to CDC website Massachusetts public-health officials have publicly rejected content posted to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website that suggests infant vaccines may still cause autism, calling the claims dangerous, misleading and harmful to public trust. State Health Commissioner Robbie Goldstein stated that because the asserted language contradicts well-established scientific consensus, the state is systematically removing CDC links from its websites and substituting alternate sources. The article highlights that the revision stems from a disputed statement now on the CDC site saying “studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism,” a phrase Massachusetts officials say sows confusion and may drive vaccine hesitancy while outbreaks of preventable illnesses rise. The piece notes that the Massachusetts Medical Society similarly emphasized that extensive clinical research shows no credible autism-vaccine link, and warned that the CDC’s shift undermines longstanding trust in federal health guidance. This move comes amid broader tension between federal and state health authorities, and the article suggests Massachusetts leaders are recalibrating communication strategies to protect children’s health in light of eroding confidence in national institutions.
Special Guest: Kim Elia
Kim is a world renowned Homeopathic educator with a passion for bringing sound Homeopathy to the world. He is co-founder of WholeHealthNow, providing comprehensive free and affordable educational resources and tools to the Homeopathic Community. Kim was instrumental in the development of the online web application for Homeopathic first aid and acute care, Homeopathic HouseCall. He will serve as the project’s principal creative lead in charge of all project development and creative strategy.
Welcome back to another “Homeopathic Hits” episode on The Robert Scott Bell Show!
On The Robert Scott Bell Show today we feature Rhododendron ferrugineum — a remedy distinguished by rheumatic and gouty symptoms, especially those precipitated by changes in weather or dampness.
Boericke emphasises its guiding modality: “worse before a storm.” The remedy also shows marked neuralgic involvement in the male genital region and wandering pains in joints and limbs.
NEED DATA SHEET
Hour 2
An Alarmingly Broad View of ‘Public Health’ In this commentary by Jacob Sullum, the author critiques a recent ruling of the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, arguing the decision reflects an over-expansive interpretation of “public health” that threatens individual autonomy. Sullum explains that in Health Freedom Fund v. Carvalho, the court upheld a vaccine mandate imposed by Los Angeles Unified School District by adopting a rationale grounded not in preventing disease transmission but simply in the recipient’s benefit from reduced symptoms—a departure from precedent in Jacobson v. Massachusetts (1905). The author argues this shift blurs the legal boundary between public and private health decisions, because earlier decisions allowed mandates only when the unvaccinated posed a danger to others. With this ruling, Sullum warns, the government could effectively mandate medical interventions on individuals even when their primary purpose is personal benefit, not communal protection. As he puts it, “The 9th Circuit’s logic would seem to bless all manner of medical mandates that the government views as beneficial to the patient, even if they have no effect on other people.” The author cautions this approach opens a path to state-compelled treatment, eroding the principle of bodily autonomy and paving the way for expansive state power over health decisions. He writes in a tone that blends legal analysis with libertarian concern, urging vigilance against the erosions of individual rights in the name of “public health” and emphasizing the need to preserve meaningful limits on governmental intrusion into medical choices.
‘ShamWow’ guy running for Congress in Texas to ‘destroy wokeism’ The article reports that Offer Vince “ShamWow” Shlomi—now 61 and better known for his infomercial career selling the “ShamWow!” towel and other late-night TV pitch products—has officially filed to run as a Republican in the March 2026 primary for Texas’s 31st Congressional District, a reliably red region covering parts of northern Austin, Temple and Fort Hood. His opponent is the long-serving incumbent Rep. John R. Carter, age 84, who has held the seat since 2003. Shlomi announced his candidacy under the name Offer Vince “ShamWow” Shlomi and said his campaign mission is to “destroy wokeism,” citing the late Charlie Kirk as a major inspirational figure and saying he wants to “make America happy.” The piece highlights his background: born in Israel, raised in Brooklyn, he attained infomercial celebrity in the 2000s with viral TV ads for products including the Slap Chop and the Schticky lint roller, before moving into entrepreneurial roles at Square One Entertainment. It also notes legal controversies—particularly a 2009 Miami Beach arrest involving an alleged altercation with a sex worker that produced a viral mug shot; prosecutors ultimately did not pursue charges. Analysts quoted in the article suggest the challenge faces serious odds: Carter is well-funded, and historical primaries show he wins comfortably. Yet Shlomi’s entry signals his ambition to reposition himself from viral pitchman to culture-war candidate, leaning heavily into provocative, social-media-friendly appeals and anti-woke rhetoric.
Remember Friends, The Power to Heal is Yours!
