Mar 2, 2026 3-5pm ET
Monday on The Robert Scott Bell Show:
Hour 1
Vaccine Hesitancy: When Safety Concerns Are Valid Vaccine hesitancy among parents and individuals stems not from blanket anti-vaccine ideology but from legitimate, evidence-based safety concerns that have accumulated over decades of childhood immunization schedules, post-marketing surveillance data, and institutional responses that prioritize compliance over transparent risk communication, according to an analysis arguing that dismissing these concerns as mere misinformation or misinformation-driven anxiety ignores real signals of harm and erodes trust in public health authorities. The article examines specific issues fueling skepticism: the expansion of the CDC childhood schedule from 3 vaccines in 1983 to 72 doses of 16 vaccines by age 18, with many administered in early infancy when the immune and neurological systems remain immature; repeated findings of elevated aluminum adjuvant exposure in infants exceeding EPA safe limits for oral intake when adjusted for body weight and injection route; documented associations between certain vaccine components and neurodevelopmental outcomes in susceptible subgroups, including studies on anti-gliadin antibodies, MTHFR polymorphisms, and immune dysregulation; post-approval signals in VAERS and international databases for myocarditis/pericarditis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, particularly in young males, with rates far higher than initially reported; and historical precedents of vaccine withdrawals (e.g., 1999 rotavirus vaccine due to intussusception, 1976 swine flu vaccine linked to Guillain-Barré syndrome) that demonstrate manufacturers and regulators can miss serious risks until widespread use reveals them. The piece criticizes the routine dismissal of parental reports of regression, seizures, or autoimmune onset following vaccination as coincidental or psychosomatic, noting that large-scale epidemiological studies often use broad definitions that dilute signals, rely on passive reporting systems known to undercapture events by factors of 10–100, and frequently suffer from conflicts of interest through pharmaceutical funding or revolving-door relationships between regulators and industry. It highlights how informed consent has been undermined by emergency use authorizations bypassing long-term placebo-controlled trials, liability shields under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and PREP Act, and public health messaging that emphasizes population-level benefits while minimizing individual risk discussions. The author contends that true vaccine confidence requires acknowledging valid safety questions, funding independent research into susceptible populations, improving adverse event surveillance with active rather than passive systems, and restoring parental choice through flexible, risk-stratified recommendations rather than universal mandates or school-entry coercion. Dismissing hesitancy as irrational or dangerous perpetuates distrust and drives people toward outright rejection, whereas addressing legitimate concerns—through rigorous transparency, compensation reform, and acknowledgment of rare but serious harms—could rebuild credibility and maintain high voluntary uptake for those who perceive benefit. The analysis frames hesitancy as a rational response to incomplete information and historical precedents rather than irrational fear, calling for a paradigm shift from enforcement to genuine partnership between families and health authorities.Special Guest: Ty Bollinger
Ty Bollinger is a happily married husband and father, a CPA, health freedom advocate, health researcher, former competitive bodybuilder, talk radio host, and best-selling author. After losing several family members to cancer, Ty refused to accept the notion that chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery were the most effective treatments available for cancer patients. He began a quest to learn all he possibly could about alternative cancer treatments and the medical industry. What he uncovered was shocking. There is ample evidence to support the allegation that the “war on cancer” is largely a fraud and that multinational pharmaceutical companies are “running the show.” In 2006, after almost a decade of cancer research, he published “Can
cer–Step Outside the Box) which (now in its 6th edition) has become a best-seller (over 150,000 copies sold) and has been called the “most eye-opening book since 1984.” Ty has now made it his life mission to share the mot remarkable discovery he made on his quest: the vast majority of all diseases (includingcancer) can be easily prevented and even cured without drugs or surgery. In 2011, Ty collaborated with his colleague, Dr. Michael Farley, to edit and publish a revolutionary book on medicinal herbs entitled, “A Guide to Understanding Herbal Medicines and Surviving the Coming Pharmaceutical Monopoly.” Drawing on over three decades of personal experience, observation, and research of Dr. Michael Farley, the book provides a refreshing and enlightening yet simple to understand guide on the medicinal uses of natural herbs. the book simplifies and demystifies herbal medicine and puts it back within the grasp of all who want to reclaim some control over their health options. Teaming up with Dr. Farley once more, in October 2012, Ty published”Work With Your Doctor to Diagnose and Cure 27 Ailments With Natural and Safe Methods.” This is a book that contains scientific research and studies to support every treatment that is, contained in its 500+ pages, including natural treatments for Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, MS, diabetes, E. Coli, cardiovascular disease, bubonic plague, and Celiac disease. In 2013, Ty published “Monumental Myths of the Modern Medical Mafia and Mainstream media and the Multitude of Lying Liars That Manufactured Them.” This expose was written to help wake people up from their slumber, to help them unplug from the matrix and to help them realize that almost every “official story” of the past century is nothing more than a “monumental myth” fabricated y those who want to control us and keep us asleep, deceived, and obedient. Ty speaks frequently to health groups, at seminars, expos, conferences, churches, and is a regular guest on multiple radio shows, television shows, and writes for numerous magazines and websites.
Welcome back to another “Homeopathic Hits” episode on The Robert Scott Bell Show!
On The Robert Scott Bell Show today, we highlight Apocynum androsaemifolium — Dogbane.
Boericke emphasizes its usefulness in rheumatic conditions marked by wandering pains, stiffness, and drawing sensations. Its picture includes peculiar sensory disturbances, trembling, prostration, and marked heat and sweating of the soles.
NEED DATA SHEET
Hour 2
Whooping Cough Not as Dangerous as Health Officials, Media Claim Recent media and public health campaigns portray whooping cough (pertussis) as a highly dangerous, potentially deadly disease warranting widespread vaccination and booster campaigns, yet historical data, clinical outcomes, and epidemiological patterns indicate the illness is far less severe in healthy, well-nourished children and adults than commonly presented, with most cases resolving without hospitalization or long-term consequences when managed with supportive care, vitamin A supplementation, and appropriate antibiotics for secondary bacterial infections. The article reviews U.S. pertussis mortality trends showing that deaths have remained extremely low—typically fewer than 20 annually in recent decades despite fluctuating case numbers—primarily occurring in unvaccinated or partially vaccinated infants under 3 months who are too young for full immunization series, while older children and adults experience milder illness characterized by prolonged coughing paroxysms but rarely life-threatening complications in otherwise healthy individuals. It contrasts current alarmist messaging with pre-vaccine era statistics, noting that pertussis mortality declined over 90% between the early 20th century and the 1940s introduction of whole-cell vaccines due to improvements in nutrition, sanitation, medical care, and living standards rather than vaccination alone, with case fatality rates dropping from 1–5% in the 1920s to under 0.1% by the 1970s in developed nations. The piece argues that modern pertussis appears more severe in some reports because widespread vaccination has shifted epidemiology: acellular pertussis vaccines induce shorter-lived immunity focused on toxin neutralization rather than colonization prevention, allowing vaccinated individuals to become asymptomatic carriers who transmit Bordetella pertussis to vulnerable infants, contributing to outbreaks in highly vaccinated populations and creating a cycle of repeated boosters that fail to interrupt transmission. Studies cited show vaccinated children and adults often experience milder but prolonged cough illness misdiagnosed as other respiratory conditions, while unvaccinated individuals may mount stronger natural immune responses leading to more noticeable but ultimately self-limiting disease. The article criticizes health officials and media for exaggerating risks to justify mandates and booster campaigns, pointing to low absolute risk in school-age children and adolescents, where hospitalization rates remain under 1% and mortality near zero, and questioning the cost-benefit of universal adult boosters given limited evidence of herd immunity impact and potential adverse events including injection-site reactions, neurological issues, and autoimmune responses reported in post-marketing surveillance. It advocates for individualized risk assessment, vitamin A therapy as a proven adjunct to reduce severity in young children, and emphasis on early recognition and supportive care rather than fear-based promotion of repeated vaccinations that may not prevent transmission or provide durable protection. The overall contention is that pertussis poses manageable risk in healthy populations and that inflated danger narratives serve to maintain high vaccination rates and pharmaceutical revenue rather than reflect objective public health priorities.
Special Guest Scott Schara
Scott Schara is a nationally recognized expert commentator on the medical murder agenda in America and the dangers of incentivized healthcare. His research proves beyond a doubt that this practice is by design. He’s the father of Grace Schara, a 19-year-old with Down syndrome who died at St. Elizabeth’s Hospital (Ascension Health) and is on a mission to shine a spotlight on the crimes of the American medical system.
He has shared his insights, research, and personal story through hundreds of television, radio, and podcast appearances, and also hosts his own show, “Deprogramming With Grace’s Dad,” which can be found on Rumble and on all major podcast platforms.
Scott’s work and story have been chronicled in a chapter of the Wall Street Journal Bestseller Rise of the Fourth Reich, by Steve Deace and Daniel Horowitz (Post Hill Press, 2023), and his writing has also appeared in the book Assault on the Image of God, by David Fiorazo (David Fiorazo Ministries, 2023). His landmark lawsuit in the wrongful death of his daughter, Scott Schara v. Ascension Health et al., concluded on June 19, 2025, after a three-week jury trial, with a “win” for the system.
Question of The Day!
Hi Robert, my 2 year old granddaughter has suddenly become cross eyed is there any homeopathy we could try? Thank you!
Nicole
Hi RSB and Super Don,
I currently have a number of acquaintances that have contracted the measles. Since my kids age 11 and 9 aren’t vaxed I’m considering arranging a play date to get them exposed and get natural immunity. My kids aren’t keen on the idea of getting sick on purpose and missing kids club at church, etc. I’m a bit hesitant as well since my oldest has asthma and allergies and my youngest tends to get a cough easily (although a dose of silver and drosera plex keeps him from getting full on sick). I’m curious about the benefits of using Mornillinum instead of actual exposure to the live virus. Do the measles nosodes provide some sort of immunity or how does that work? What dosage and potency would be suitable to give my kids if we go that route?
Thanks,
Curious in Canada







