Aug 8, 2025 3-5pm ET
Friday on The Robert Scott Bell Show:
Hour 1
With RFK Jr. on Their Side, Parents Feel Emboldened to Question Vaccines The article explores how Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s role as Health Secretary has reshaped public discourse around childhood vaccination, emboldening parents who previously felt marginalized to question or reject routine immunizations. Since Kennedy took office, vaccine exemption rates among school-aged children have climbed sharply, particularly in states with lax exemption laws. Pediatricians report a significant uptick in parents delaying or declining vaccines, citing Kennedy’s statements and policies as justification. Public health officials warn that this trend has already contributed to rising outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases, including recent surges in measles and whooping cough. Kennedy has long questioned vaccine safety, and while he claims to support informed consent, critics argue that his rhetoric often emphasizes rare adverse events without adequate context, leading to public fear and misunderstanding. The article notes a chilling effect on pediatricians, many of whom now spend increased time addressing vaccine misinformation or navigating difficult conversations with newly skeptical parents. Despite assurances from Kennedy’s office that the goal is merely to increase transparency and choice, national immunization rates have begun to slip, with some experts warning of potential long-term consequences for herd immunity. The piece concludes that Kennedy’s influence has fundamentally shifted the vaccine conversation, making once fringe skepticism more mainstream and complicating efforts to maintain public health standards
Almost Half of American Voters Support Reevaluating CDC’s Childhood Vaccine Schedule A recent poll conducted by Zogby Strategies reveals that 49 percent of American voters support a formal reevaluation of the CDC’s childhood and adolescent vaccine schedule, reflecting a growing desire for scrutiny over long-standing immunization policies. The survey, which included over 1,000 registered voters across the political spectrum, found that only 30 percent opposed such a review, while 21 percent were unsure. Among parents with children under the age of 12, support was even higher, with nearly 60 percent expressing favor for revisiting current recommendations. The findings coincide with rising public debate surrounding vaccine safety, medical freedom, and government transparency, amplified in part by recent political figures who have advocated for more cautious approaches to pediatric vaccination. While mainstream medical organizations continue to endorse the existing CDC schedule as both safe and effective, the poll suggests a substantial segment of the population is open to rethinking established norms, particularly in light of heightened awareness following the COVID-19 pandemic. Analysts interpret the data as a sign of declining institutional trust and a shift toward greater individual involvement in health decisions. The article concludes that calls for reevaluation are unlikely to subside and may influence future policy discussions at both state and federal levels.
Special Guest: Dana Ullman
DANA ULLMAN, MPH, CCH, is one of America’s leading advocates for homeopathy. He has authored 10 books, including The Homeopathic Revolution: Why Famous People and Cultural Heroes Choose Homeopathy, Homeopathic Medicines for Children and Infants, and (the best-selling) Everybody’s Guide to Homeopathic Medicines (with Stephen Cummings, MD). Dana also created an e-course How to Use a Homeopathic Medicine Kit which integrates 80 short videos (averaging 15 minutes) with his famous ebook that is a continually growing resource to 500+ clinical studies published in peer-review medical journals testing homeopathic medicines. This ebook combines the descriptions of these studies with practical clinical information on how to use homeopathic medicines for 100+ common ailments. This ebook is entitled Evidence Based Homeopathic Family Medicine, and it is an invaluable resource. Dana has been certified in classical homeopathy by the leading organization in the U.S. for professional homeopaths.
Hour 2
Question of The Day!
Afternoon RSB, I do not get to listen live much anymore.
I would like to get your opinion on Methylene Blue. I have heard you say it’s synthetic and it is a chemical compound. And I understand that is a concern.
I have been taking it daily for about eight or nine weeks. And I started taking it because Robert Kennedy is taking it.
But I am not having any effect that I notice from the Methylene Blue. Good or Bad.
I do not know whether to continue or stop and start something like Beta-Glucan.
What is your opinion?
Randy
Robert,
You have referred to the pharmaceutical industry as Pharmakeia, and, as a student of scripture, this reference is used throughout the Bible. However, most of the time, I’ve found that other words, with the same meaning (according to the Exhaustive Concordance), are used instead, in most versions….Sorcery, drugs, witchcraft,etc. See https://biblehub.com/greek/5331.htm and see all the words that apply to Pharmakeia. If you want to read a passage that is so like our world today, read Revelation 18 and focus on the last sentence in verse 23. I understand if you disregard this message; but, if you read it, in light of my statements above, you’ll never forget it.
Regards,
Judy
Welcome to another Homeopathic Hits segment on The Robert Scott Bell Show!
Today on The Robert Scott Bell Show, we spotlight Kalium Chloricum, a lesser-known yet potent remedy drawn from the oxidizing power of potassium chlorate.
Historically valued for its disinfectant properties, its homeopathic counterpart is equally powerful—especially in cases of burning throat pain, oral ulceration, glandular inflammation, and septic overload. This is the remedy for purging heat, neutralizing toxicity, and restoring balance when inflammation becomes overwhelming.
Download the Information Sheet
Question of The Day!
Hi RSB & SD, I’m wondering if you could talk a bit about goldbacks. How does it work and is it state specific?
Makanani
Special Guest – Michael Boldin
The Ninth Amendment: Partner to the Tenth in Limiting Federal Power The article emphasizes that the Ninth Amendment is not an extension of federal power but a crucial complement to the Tenth, working together as a constitutional firewall to restrain central authority. Contrary to popular misunderstanding—where it’s either ignored or mischaracterized—the Ninth Amendment was deliberately crafted to prevent the enumeration of rights from being interpreted as exhaustive, ensuring that unlisted individual and state rights remain protected. Drawing on James Madison’s objections to the Federalist concern that listing rights could inadvertently expand government power, the author notes Madison designed the Ninth and Tenth Amendments as paired safeguards, ratified in December 1791, affirming that all powers not granted to the federal government remain with states or the people. The piece quotes John Taylor of Caroline to illustrate how both amendments reinforce the principle of limited, delegated governmental authority, asserting that their precision was “happily contrived” to safeguard state sovereignty. The Ninth serves as a rule of constitutional construction, signaling strict interpretation of federal power, while the Tenth explicitly reserves residual authority to states and individuals. Together, they uphold the Constitution’s foundational premise: the federal government may only exercise powers expressly delegated; all other rights and governance obligations default to closer institutions or the citizenry.
Forgotten Foundation: The Story of Small Things Grow Great by Concord This article revisits the foundational philosophy behind the American Revolution through the lens of John Dickinson’s 1767 writings, particularly his use of the Latin phrase “Concordia res parvae crescunt,” meaning “small things grow great by concord.” In the wake of the Stamp Act’s repeal and the subsequent passage of the Declaratory Act asserting Parliament’s complete authority, Dickinson warned that unchecked power—no matter how trivial at first—inevitably grows dangerous. His Letters from a Farmer in Pennsylvania emphasized that liberty is lost not through a single act but through a series of tolerated intrusions, and likewise, freedom is reclaimed through consistent, unified, small-scale actions. The article draws a direct parallel between Dickinson’s revolutionary strategy and the modern decentralist movement advanced by the Tenth Amendment Center. Rather than advocating sweeping federal reforms, the center embraces local action, grassroots resistance, and nullification as effective and historically grounded methods of restoring constitutional limits on government. The author argues that great societal change originates from humble beginnings when people unite around a shared principle and act consistently over time. Dickinson’s maxim is presented not just as historical insight but as a timeless guidepost for today’s liberty-minded individuals and communities seeking to reclaim self-governance and constitutional integrity from centralized overreach.
How to Beat the Empire: The Founders’ 4‑Word Formula for Victory The article, presented as part of the Path to Liberty podcast by Michael Boldin, underscores a timeless revolutionary strategy articulated by John Dickinson in 1767—a simple, powerful formula: “small things grow great by concord.” He adopted this phrase from ancient Rome to convey that empires crumble not through grand gestures but through persistent, unified grassroots resistance. Dickinson’s Letters from a Farmer in Pennsylvania warned that oppressive power expands unbearably when small violations are tolerated, and similarly, liberty is reclaimed through steady, collective actions. Boldin connects this historic insight to the modern decentralized movement championed by the Tenth Amendment Center, which promotes state nullification and local resistance as faithful expressions of the originalist constitutional design. The article insists that societal transformation rarely unfolds through dramatic declarations; more often, liberty emerges incrementally, through disciplined alignment with shared values, community-based initiatives, and deliberate, sustained effort. By reactivating Dickinson’s principle, the author sets a strategic blueprint: legal overreach can be overcome not in traditional centers of power, but through coordinated, small-scale acts of unity preserving self-governance and limiting federal encroachment, proving that the revolutionary roadmap of the founders remains relevant today.
Remember Social Distancing? It Doesn’t Really Protect You From Infections, Study Shows A new study challenges the effectiveness of social distancing, particularly in indoor settings where people stand in line. Researchers found that simply maintaining a six-foot distance does not significantly reduce the risk of airborne infection due to how aerosols behave in enclosed environments. The study used real-world simulations to examine how viral particles travel and accumulate, revealing that indoor air currents can keep infectious particles suspended and concentrated at breathing level for extended periods. As a result, individuals queuing indoors—even if spaced apart—are still exposed to potentially infectious air, especially if the room lacks proper ventilation. The authors suggest that physical distancing, while intuitive, provides a false sense of security when used as a standalone strategy. They argue that measures such as improved air filtration, reduced indoor crowding, and effective ventilation systems are far more impactful in mitigating airborne disease transmission. The findings call into question many pandemic-era public health policies that emphasized distancing without addressing air quality. Rather than relying solely on physical spacing, the study advocates for a layered approach that considers environmental conditions and airflow dynamics. This research adds to a growing body of evidence that airborne transmission is complex and context-dependent, requiring more than just simple physical barriers to ensure safety.
Questions of The Day!
Is there a product that can help with cataracts. I’m looking for an alternative to surgery.
Sheryl
Hey Super Don,
Is there a way to search the comments section? I would like to ask a question, but if it’s already been asked…don’t want to be redundant.
Laura
Remember Friends, The Power to Heal is Yours!
