October 31, 2024 3-5PM ET
Thursday on The Robert Scott Bell Show:
Hour 1
Special Guest Jonathan Emord
For the past 37 years, Jonathan W. Emord has litigated against the federal bureaucracy, winning over and over again. Ron Paul calls Jonathan “an expert in constitutional theory and history” and “an expert litigatorwith a long string of legal victories over the federal bureaucracy.” George Noory calls him “a Knight in Shining Armor” and “a warrior out to save our rights.” Congressmen Dan Burton and John Doolittle describe him as “an intellectual warrior for the rights and freedoms of people in America.” Jonathan has a unique, detailed knowledge of the federal bureaucracy, the deep state. He knows how to defeat it. Jonathan graduated from the University of Illinois 
(BA, political science and history, 1982) and DePaul University College of Law (JD, 1985). He served as an attorney in the Federal Communications Commission during the Reagan administration. A leading constitutional law and litigation expert, he is the author of five critically acclaimed books. He has won more cases against the Food and Drug Administration in federal court than any other attorney in American history, earning him the nickname “FDA Dragon Slayer.” He is a columnist for Townhall.com, PJ Media.com, Americangreatness.com, and the U.S.A. Today Magazine. He frequently appears on national radio and television programs. He is married to Sheryl Emord, and they have two children, twins Justice and Angelica. They reside in Clifton, Virginia.
Watch — Donald Trump Rides Garbage Truck to Wisconsin Rally: ‘250 Million People Are Not Garbage’ Donald Trump made a bold statement by arriving at a Wisconsin rally in a garbage truck to counter President Joe Biden’s recent comments likening some Trump supporters to “garbage.” Wearing an orange vest, Trump declared, “250 million people are not garbage,” aligning himself with ordinary Americans who feel sidelined by the current administration’s rhetoric. This event served as a visual protest against Biden and Kamala Harris, who have previously characterized Trump voters negatively. Trump criticized Biden’s dismissal of his supporters, equating it with Hillary Clinton’s infamous “basket of deplorables” comment. The garbage truck entrance, which resonated well with Trump’s populist base, underscored his narrative of reclaiming dignity and rights for Americans marginalized by political elites. Supporters took to social media to praise the gesture as a symbol of solidarity and defiance. The event underscored Trump’s emphasis on “bringing the country back,” highlighting his ongoing commitment to championing working-class interests and challenging the Biden administration’s policies, which Trump claims have failed middle America.
The Price of Garbage Is Up 18.5% Under Biden-Harris Garbage collection costs have surged 18.5% since the Biden-Harris administration began, contributing toincreased financial strain on American households. U.S. Department of Labor data indicates that inflation in utilities, including water, sewage, and trash collection, has risen steadily, with garbage collection rates seeing a notable 4.75% year-over-year increase as of September 2024. This trend in utility cost hikes mirrors broader inflationary pressures affecting essential living expenses, which critics attribute to the administration’s economic policies. Rising garbage costs have become a symbol for critics of the administration’s handling of inflation and affordability, as they argue that higher service costs reflect deeper economic mismanagement. Republican figures have seized on this data as evidence of the administration’s failure to address the cost-of-living crisis effectively. As garbage and utility costs rise, they fuel voter dissatisfaction, especially among those struggling with tighter budgets, providing a key talking point in critiques of Biden’s economic leadership and the administration’s impact on basic household expenses.
If Trump Wins The article speculates on potential shifts across U.S. policy and society if Donald Trump secures another term. Expected changes include replacing the Federal Reserve chairman and revising monetary policies to combat inflation, while possibly exploring a shift from income taxes toward tariffs. Trump’s administration would likely prioritize deregulation, especially for traditional energy sectors, and possibly initiate a diplomatic approach to the Ukraine conflict, potentially securing peace without direct intervention. Immigration policy would likely involve measures encouraging self-deportation, while Trump’s alignment with figures like RFK Jr. on health issues might pose challenges to Big Pharma, particularly concerning pandemic-era accountability. Domestically, Trump’s second term could prompt shifts in media and technology industries, as these sectors recalibrate their political alignments and censorship policies. The piece further suggests that a Trump presidency would trigger a regulatory renaissance, encourage economic reforms, and potentially reshape alliances, redefining how government, business, and media intersect in America today. The article proposes that Trump’s win would bring a profound restructuring of the nation’s political, social, and economic framework, challenging traditional institutions and alliances.
ANH Sues FDA to Stop U.S. Homeopathy Ban The Alliance for Natural Health USA (ANH-USA) and homeopathic manufacturer Meditrend have filed a lawsuit against the FDA overnew regulations that could eliminate over-the-counter (OTC) homeopathic products. The FDA’s 2022 guidance requires these products to undergo the same rigorous pre-market approval and clinical trials as conventional drugs, despite their unique manufacturing and safety history. The lawsuit argues that the FDA’s stance contradicts the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and the CARES Act, both of which intended for homeopathics to be regulated separately from pharmaceuticals due to their long-standing safety record. ANH-USA claims the FDA’s policy disregards Congressional intent and risks collapsing the $6 billion homeopathic industry by imposing unaffordable testing costs, which are feasible for patent-protected drugs but not for homeopathic remedies. Furthermore, ANH-USA alleges this shift grants the FDA discretionary power to pull homeopathic products without clear regulatory guidelines, violating the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause. This lawsuit seeks to protect consumer access to homeopathic remedies and prevent the FDA from implementing restrictive measures that disproportionately favor Big Pharma interests.
World Bank Bureaucrats Lost Track of at Least $24B in Funds Fighting Climate Change A recent Oxfam investigation reveals that World Bank bureaucrats lost track of at least $24 billion allocated for climate change projects due to “poor record-keeping practices,” with the missing funds potentially reaching up to $41 billion. The study criticizes the World Bank’s accounting methods, which log climate funding upon project approval rather than completion, raising transparency concerns about the actual use of funds. An anonymous insider claimed that figures on spending are frequently fabricated, leaving accountability gaps in tracing how funds are utilized. This issue affects U.S. taxpayers directly, as the U.S. holds a 16% share in the World Bank, translating to an estimated $4 billion loss for Americans. Oxfam criticized the lack of clarity on whether these funds genuinely reached climate initiatives in poorer nations. Amid these findings, the Biden administration recently approved an additional $150 billion in lending capacity for the bank over the next decade, intensifying calls for better oversight. Critics argue that the World Bank’s lax oversight facilitates wasteful spending on politically driven causes that may not serve U.S. interests.
The Biden-Harris Administration Wasted Nearly One Billion on Misinformation A new Congressional report reveals that the Biden-Harris administration spent close to one billion dollars on public healthcampaigns that allegedly misrepresented COVID-19 science and discouraged trust in public institutions. The report claims the administration’s “Stop the Spread” campaign promoted the idea that COVID-19 vaccines prevented transmission, despite evidence to the contrary. This messaging, primarily led by the CDC and funded by taxpayer dollars, reinforced mandates and restrictions that many later viewed as excessive and unfounded. Critics argue that the misleading campaigns diminished trust in other vaccinations, with vaccination rates for unrelated diseases reportedly declining due to eroded confidence in the public health system. The report also highlights issues around censorship, noting that dissenting scientific opinions were marginalized to maintain a unified narrative. This report underscores ongoing calls for reform in federal health communications to prioritize transparency and factual integrity, aiming to prevent future spending on campaigns that may distort public understanding of health issues.
Hour 2
House Floats Law to Make Colleges That Mandated COVID Shots Pay for Vaccine Injuries A new bill introduced in the U.S. House would require colleges that mandated COVID-19 vaccines to cover medical expenses for students experiencing adverse vaccine effects. Titled the “University Forced Vaccination Student Injury Mitigation Act,” the bill was introduced by Rep. Matt Rosendale and co-sponsored by Reps. Eli Crane and Bill Posey. The bill mandates that any college with COVID-19 vaccination requirements must compensate students who experience conditions like myocarditis, Guillain-Barré Syndrome, and thrombosis due to the vaccine. Students would be able to submit claims with medical certification of their condition, and colleges would need to cover costs within 30 days or risk losing federal funding. The proposal comes amid heightened scrutiny of COVID-19 vaccine mandates and concerns over potential side effects, especially among younger adults. Supporters argue that institutions enforcing vaccine policies should take responsibility for any associated harm, aligning accountability with students’ rights to informed consent.
Special Guest Phil Lyman
Phil Lyman is a 5th generation Utahn whose bold and fearless leadership is well-known in San Juan County and throughout the region. As county commissioner, Lyman led a peaceful protest against federal closure of public roads. The following year, the Utah Association of Counties voted Lyman “Commissioner of the Year” for his unrelenting commitment to defend his constituents and their rights. Lyman’s early career showed he had both the talent and the work ethic to make a significant difference in developing communities. After earning a bachelor’s degree in accounting from Brigham Young University followed by a master’s degree in taxation from the University of Utah, Lyman returned to his hometown of Blanding when his father unexpectedly passed away, and assumed responsibility for the CPA firm his father founded. Lyman co-founded Blanding’s first Rotary Club as the charter president, and created and led the Blanding Area Travel Council.
Lyman has been pivotal in transforming healthcare throughout San Juan County. He helped organize and launch Utah Navajo Health Systems – today the largest private employer in the county. As a county commissioner, he created the San Juan Public Health Department and expanded public health. As a county commissioner, Lyman worked tirelessly to preserve roads and access to public lands and to reduce the vast federal hold on Utah’s public lands. He served as chair of the Seven-County Infrastructure Coalition, working closely other county commissioners and with federal and state agencies to develop vital infrastructure, including the San Rafael Research Center, pipeline and rail easements for oilfields and improve rail line delivery system, while preserving autonomy for the counties, cities, and families. As a state legislator, Lyman sponsored or co-sponsored 65 bills in his four sessions, and was chair/co-chair of the conservative caucus throughout his service. He championed property and water rights, rural healthcare, natural resources management, critical needs of indigenous people, and pushed back on federal attempts to control state areas of authority.
Phil Lyman Wants to Toss Gov. Cox from Office and Upend Utah’s Election Results Utah State Representative Phil Lyman has petitioned the Utah Supreme Court to remove Governor Spencer Cox andLieutenant Governor Deidre Henderson from office, challenging their eligibility to remain on the upcoming ballot. Lyman contends that Cox and Henderson engaged in “malfeasance” and unconstitutional practices, arguing that the state’s signature-gathering route, which allowed Cox to qualify as a candidate, disregards Utah’s preferred convention-focused process for nominating candidates. According to Lyman, only individuals receiving at least 60% support at the Utah Republican Party’s nominating convention should qualify for the general election ballot. He believes this method best aligns with the party’s values and avoids undue influence from external interests. Lyman also proposes that current nominees be replaced with candidates who gained support at the convention, suggesting Utah Senate President Stuart Adams as acting governor should the court agree with his claims. Lyman’s petition aims to restore what he describes as integrity and transparency in the nomination process by emphasizing internal party selections over broader public primaries. This case raises broader questions about the balance between party conventions and public primaries, with potential ramifications for Utah’s political landscape and candidate selection process.
Phil Lyman Appeals to U.S. Supreme Court to Remove Gov. Cox from Governor Race Following the Utah Supreme Court’s dismissal of his petition, Utah Representative Phil Lyman is taking his case to the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking to disqualify Governor Spencer Cox from the 2024 gubernatorial race. Lyman argues that Utah’s signature-gathering process for candidate qualification, which allowed Cox to bypass the Utah Republican Party’s convention, contradicts constitutional principles of candidate selection. He believes only those who receive the party’s endorsement through convention voting should advance, as this approach best preserves the party’s voice in nominations. By challenging the signature-gathering route, Lyman seeks to limit public primary influence, arguing that broad voter-based primaries dilute the party’s selection power. The case has implications beyond Utah, raising the question of how much weight should be given to conventions versus public primaries in determining party candidates. If the U.S. Supreme Court considers the case, a ruling could redefine candidate nomination processes and impact states with similar nominating methods. Lyman’s appeal highlights the tension between party autonomy and public access in state election systems, spotlighting issues of electoral integrity and governance structures in candidate selection.
Welcome back to “Homeopathic Hits” on The Robert Scott Bell Show.
Today, we’re spotlighting Actaea Spicata, a remedy renowned for easing joint pain, rheumatism, and swelling, particularly in small joints.
Actaea Spicata provides natural relief for arthritis and other joint-related ailments.
Download the Information Sheet
Question of The Day!
Thank you for the response regarding H Pylori! What is the best way to keep the stomach acidic enough? Are there recommended supplements? Also, just to clarify, you have to remain for 20 mins lying on each side continuously over the course of 6 hours? If so, can this be split up into a few separate rounds over a day or two? Thanks!
Grace
Which Halloween Candies Are Best for Your Gut Health? Health experts have identified Halloween candies that may have less impact on gut health, recommending dark chocolate and candies with nuts due to their lower sugar content and additional fiber, which support digestion. While most Halloween treats are high in sugar and lack dietary fiber, dark chocolate offers antioxidants, and nut-based candies like peanut M&Ms provide fiber and protein. Sugary, fiber-less candies can disrupt gut bacteria, causing bloating and digestive discomfort. Experts warn that sugar substitutes like sorbitol, found in sugar-free candies, can also lead to digestive issues such as diarrhea. Dr. Faith Coleman from Study Finds suggests that indulging in moderation and selecting treats with health benefits can help prevent gut discomfort after Halloween festivities. For those looking to enjoy the holiday without the digestive upset, focusing on these healthier candy options can offer a balanced approach, preserving gut health while still celebrating the season.
The Great Indoors: After Pandemic, Study Finds People Don’t Want to Go Outside Anymore A study from Clemson University and UCLA reveals a significantdrop in the amount of time Americans spend outside, with a reduction of nearly an hour per day post-pandemic compared to 2019. Using data from 34,000 Americans, the study found that out-of-home activities decreased, driven by shifts to remote work, online shopping, and home-based exercise routines. While this change has positive environmental implications by reducing travel emissions, it raises concerns about increased social isolation and its impact on mental health. The researchers note that this trend was already developing pre-pandemic but accelerated significantly due to COVID-19. Urban planners are now encouraged to rethink city layouts to attract people back into public spaces through recreational and cultural venues, as technology continues to enable people to work, socialize, and shop from home. The findings underscore a profound, potentially lasting shift in lifestyle, as people prioritize convenience and home-based activities over outdoor engagements, challenging cities to adapt their infrastructure and focus on creating vibrant community spaces to counteract the indoor shift.
Remember Friends, The Power to Heal is Yours!
