January 23, 2025 3-5PM ET
Thursday on The Robert Scott Bell Show:
Hour 1
Special Guest Jonathan Emord
For the past 37 years, Jonathan W. Emord has litigated against the federal bureaucracy, winning over and over again. Ron Paul calls Jonathan “an expert in constitutional theory and history” and “an expert litigatorwith a long string of legal victories over the federal bureaucracy.” George Noory calls him “a Knight in Shining Armor” and “a warrior out to save our rights.” Congressmen Dan Burton and John Doolittle describe him as “an intellectual warrior for the rights and freedoms of people in America.” Jonathan has a unique, detailed knowledge of the federal bureaucracy, the deep state. He knows how to defeat it. Jonathan graduated from the University of Illinois 
(BA, political science and history, 1982) and DePaul University College of Law (JD, 1985). He served as an attorney in the Federal Communications Commission during the Reagan administration. A leading constitutional law and litigation expert, he is the author of five critically acclaimed books. He has won more cases against the Food and Drug Administration in federal court than any other attorney in American history, earning him the nickname “FDA Dragon Slayer.” He is a columnist for Townhall.com, PJ Media.com, Americangreatness.com, and the U.S.A. Today Magazine. He frequently appears on national radio and television programs. He is married to Sheryl Emord, and they have two children, twins Justice and Angelica. They reside in Clifton, Virginia.
What executive orders did Trump sign on day one? On his first day back in office, President Donald Trump signed numerous executive orders, signaling sweeping policy reversals and fulfilling key campaign promises. Major actions included withdrawing the U.S. from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Paris Climate Accord, reinstating the classification of federal employees under “Schedule F” to make them easier to fire, and issuing pardons for over 1,500 January 6 defendants. Trump also declared a national energy emergency to fast-track fossil fuel projects, revoked Biden-era electric vehicle targets, and reversed multiple diversity and inclusion orders. His controversial executive orders included ending birthright citizenship for children born to unauthorized immigrants and mandating federal agencies to recognize only two genders. Additionally, he paused the TikTok ban for 75 days and ordered name changes for the Gulf of Mexico (to the “Gulf of America”) and Alaska’s Mount Denali (back to Mount McKinley). Trump also declared a national border emergency and vowed to carry out mass deportations. These actions highlight a dramatic shift in policy, sparking intense debate over their legal and societal implications. Legal challenges are anticipated for several of these orders, especially those related to immigration and energy.
Court Rules Warrantless Section 702 Searches Violated the Fourth Amendment In a landmark ruling, a federal court declared that warrantless digital searches conductedunder Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) violated the Fourth Amendment. The case, involving defendant Agron Hasbajrami, revealed the FBI’s misuse of the provision to conduct invasive surveillance on Americans without proper authorization. While the court ruled these searches unconstitutional, it denied suppressing the evidence obtained on separate grounds. Advocacy groups like the ACLU hailed the decision as a critical step in addressing government overreach and called on Congress to reform Section 702. This decision underscores growing concerns about privacy violations in the digital age and highlights the need for stronger constitutional protections.
Trump orders US withdrawal from World Health Organization Newly inaugurated President Donald Trump signed an executive order officially withdrawing the U.S. from the World Health Organization (WHO). This action reverses President Biden’s 2021 decision to rejoin the WHO after Trump’s initial withdrawal plans in 2020. Trump’s directive halts U.S. funding and resources for the WHO, recalls American personnel, and instructs the Secretary of State to identify alternative partners to assume the organization’s functions. The WHO expressed regret over the decision, urging the U.S. to reconsider, citing the global importance of cooperation for health initiatives. Critics fear the withdrawal could undermine pandemic preparedness and global health diplomacy, while Trump’s supporters view the move as necessary to reduce U.S. dependence on international bodies.
Trump administration freezes many health agency reports and online posts The Trump administration has imposed a temporary freeze on publiccommunications from federal health agencies, including the CDC, FDA, and NIH, until February 1. This directive halts press releases, social media updates, website posts, and publications in the Federal Register, requiring political appointee approval for exceptions. Critics argue this pause could delay critical public health alerts, especially during disease outbreaks or foodborne illness events, which rely on timely dissemination. The administration justifies the freeze as a standard practice for new leadership to coordinate agency messaging and reestablish a hierarchy. However, public health advocates warn that silencing scientific communication risks public safety. Historically, Trump’s political appointees have clashed with health agencies over pandemic-related messaging, fueling fears that this freeze could lead to politicized narratives. Exceptions are permitted for urgent safety or security communications, but critics contend the ambiguity in guidelines may hinder proactive health measures.
President Trump Mandates Federal Workers ‘Return to In-Person Work’ President Trump has signed an executive order requiring all federal employees to resume full-time in-person work at their designated offices, marking the end of widespread remote work policies implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. The “Return to In-Person Work” mandate allows department heads limited discretion to grant exemptions where necessary but emphasizes restoring pre-pandemic work structures. Additionally, Trump imposed a temporary hiring freeze for most federal agencies, excluding the military and immigration enforcement, to streamline operations and address federal budget concerns. The order follows Trump’s campaign promise to increase government efficiency and accountability, with supporters arguing it reinforces public trust in government services. Critics, however, highlight potential disruptions for employees and departments that adapted successfully to remote work models. The policy reflects Trump’s broader push to reshape federal governance, aligning with his stance against pandemic-related mandates and remote workplace flexibility.
Hour 2
Fluoridated Water Harmed Americans: Economic Evidence A study published in the Journal of Health Economics suggests that childhood exposure to fluoridated community water had long-term negative effectson Americans, despite its dental benefits. Using data from over 20 million individuals, the study found that exposure to fluoridated water correlated with reduced high school graduation rates, lower economic sufficiency, and poorer physical and health outcomes in adulthood. The research, conducted by a Texas A&M University economist, utilized natural fluoride levels obtained from the CDC through a Freedom of Information Act request. The findings highlight the unintended consequences of water fluoridation policies mandated by many states and local governments, including those promoted by the CDC. Critics argue that while fluoride may reduce dental decay, its broader health impacts have been overlooked in policymaking. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the nominee for Health and Human Services Secretary under the Trump administration, has emphasized the importance of returning to evidence-based scientific policies and transparency in public health decisions. The study underscores the need for comprehensive evaluation of public health measures, integrating economic analysis and long-term societal impacts, to inform future policy reforms.
Special Guest John Stockton
His number is retired, a street in Salt Lake City is named for him, and there is a statue of his likeness outside the arena where he played his entire NBA career. All this lends testimony to the extraordinary career of Utah Jazz point guard John Stockton, a throwback player who brought his hard-nosed, all-business approach to every game he ever played. Stockton was “old school” in every sense and that style suited him well for 19 seasons, including 17 in which he played every game on the schedule. He was a ten-time All Star, led the league in assists a record nine consecutive seasons, and holds the single-season record for assists with 1,164. At the time of his retirement, Stockton held the NBA career record for assists and steals with 15,806 and 3,265 respectively. The gritty Stockton led the Jazz to the playoffs each of his 19 seasons and won gold medals at both the 1992 and 1996 Olympics.
U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Emergency Appeal in Medical Free Speech Case The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear an emergency appeal in a medical freespeech case involving Washington State physicians disciplined for publicly criticizing official COVID-19 narratives. The lawsuit, Stockton v. Ferguson, brought by prominent plaintiffs including basketball legend John Stockton and Children’s Health Defense, argues that the Washington Medical Commission violated the First Amendment by penalizing doctors for their “soapbox speech.” Approximately 60 physicians face disciplinary actions for statements challenging mainstream public health policies. While this is the second rejection of the emergency appeal by the Supreme Court, the case remains active in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, with oral arguments scheduled for May. Plaintiffs claim that silencing dissenting medical professionals undermines public health by restricting informed patient decision-making. Critics of the Washington Medical Commission argue the penalties imposed on physicians represent government overreach and suppress free speech under the guise of policing misinformation. Advocates believe this case could set a precedent for future protections of doctors’ rights to express their views without fear of reprisal. Despite the legal setback, the plaintiffs express optimism, noting growing public awareness of flaws in mainstream COVID-19 narratives and the evolving landscape of medical free speech cases.
Welcome to another “Homeopathic Hits” episode on The Robert Scott Bell Show!
Today, we’re highlighting Alcoholus, a unique remedy that addresses addiction, nervous overstimulation, and emotional instability.
For those seeking relief from the physical and emotional toll of alcohol or substance dependency, Alcoholus provides a natural, holistic approach to recovery and balance.
Download the Information Sheet
Remember Friends, The Power to Heal is Yours!
