Sept 25, 2025 3-5pm ET
Thursday on The Robert Scott Bell Show:
Hour 1
Special Guest: Jonathan Emord
For the past 37 years, Jonathan W. Emord has litigated against the federal bureaucracy, winning over and over again. Ron Paul calls Jonathan “an expert in constitutional theory and history” and “an expert litigator with a long string of legal victories over the federal bureaucracy.” George Noory calls him “a Knight in Shining Armor” and “a warrior out to save our rights.” Congressmen Dan Burton and John Doolittle describe him as “an intellectual warrior for the rights and freedoms of people in America.” Jonathan has a unique, detailed knowledge of the federal bureaucracy, the deep state. He knows how to defeat it. Jonathan graduated from the University of Illinois (BA, political science and history, 1982) and DePaul University College of Law (JD, 1985). He served as an attorney in the Federal Communications Commission during the Reagan administration. A leading constitutional law and litigation expert, he is the author of five critically acclaimed books. He has won more cases against the Food and Drug Administration in federal court than any other attorney in American history, earning him the nickname “FDA Dragon Slayer.” He is a columnist for Townhall.com, PJ Media.com, Americangreatness.com, and the U.S.A. Today Magazine. He frequently appears on national radio and television programs. He is married to Sheryl Emord, and they have two children, twins Justice and Angelica. They reside in Clifton, Virginia.
New Leftist Talking Point: “Christian Nationalism” is Latest Threat to Democracy The article claims that following Charlie Kirk’s memorial and a surge in Christian conservative engagement, left‑leaning media and political actors have begun framing “Christian nationalism” as an existential threat to democracy—a rhetorical strategy it labels the “new talking point.” It argues that outlets such as MSNBC are warning that conservatives are blending traditional Christian values with political ideology, casting that fusion as a dangerous movement. According to the piece, this framing is a deliberate effort to delegitimize faith‑based political perspectives by branding them as extremist. The article recounts commentary from Tina Nguyen warning that Kirk’s followers might merge Christianity with “protection of Western civilization values,” thereby conflating religious conviction with political identity. The author interprets that kind of language as a way to stigmatize religious adherents, suggesting that it frames Christian principles themselves as intellectual or civilizational threats. The essay connects this trend to criticism of the record attendance at Kirk’s memorial, stating that leftist voices are disturbed by the public’s embrace of faith as a political force. It cites Don Lemon’s criticism of the memorial’s Christian messaging as part of this broader push to vilify religiously oriented civic life. Labeling these efforts “deranged,” the piece predicts escalating attacks on faith, portraying this rhetorical campaign as the “new battlefield” targeting Christian conservatives.
MSM ‘Forgets’ They’ve Been Warning About Tylenol And Pregnancy For Over A Decade The article claims mainstream media outlets such as CNN, MSNBC, and Reuters have hypocritically rebranded themselves as skeptical of Trump’s recent linking of prenatal acetaminophen (Tylenol) use to autism, despite the author asserting they had previously issued warnings about risks from the drug during pregnancy. It cites various prior headlines from those networks suggesting an association between acetaminophen during pregnancy and a higher incidence of ADHD, hyperactivity, or developmental concerns in children, and contrasts them with recent dismissive or “gotcha”‑style coverage of Trump’s claims. The author argues that the media has selectively erased or downplayed its own historical reporting in order to feign opposition, rather than address the substance of the claims being made. The piece highlights what it sees as media inconsistency, claiming that leftist outlets now ignore or apologize for past coverage when it aligns with conservative policy narratives, while refusing to engage with emerging data. It references a recent statement from Harvard’s School of Public Health suggesting an association between acetaminophen exposure during pregnancy and neurodevelopmental disorders, implying the media is now suppressing evolving science. Ultimately, the article frames the backlash against Trump’s announcement as less about scientific debate and more about political posturing, accusing media institutions of rewriting history to maintain narrative control.
“Unacceptable and Wrong”: Google Admits to Censoring COVID Content Under Pressure From Biden Administration Google (Alphabet) has acknowledged in a letter to Congress that the Biden administration exerted pressure on its platforms—particularly YouTube—to remove content related to COVID-19 that did not violate existing policies, labeling such government influence “unacceptable and wrong.” According to the correspondence, Google is offering to reinstate accounts that were banned under prior COVID-19 and election misinformation rules that are no longer in effect. The revelation emerged amid a House Judiciary investigation led by Representative Jim Jordan into alleged censorship practices, with documents indicating “repeated and sustained outreach” from senior administration officials seeking content removal. Google’s statement also disavows the use of third‑party fact‑checkers going forward, claims that YouTube “never had” a policy banning discussion of COVID origins, and stresses commitment to free expression and a diversity of viewpoints. Critics, including Children’s Health Defense (which was deplatformed during the pandemic), welcomed the admission but argue that the damage is lasting: Google’s search and algorithmic systems, they contend, continue to suppress certain voices. The letter stops short of admitting legal liability, and observers question the nature and extent of governmental pressure—whether it was direct coercion or persuasive “jawboning”—as well as how future content moderation will be insulated from political influence.
Trump hangs portraits of presidents in Rose Garden showing Biden as autopen President Donald Trump unveiled a new “Presidential Walk of Fame” outside the Oval Office and along the White House colonnade that features framed portraits of past presidents—but instead of a photograph of Joe Biden, his slot contains only an image of an autopen device replicating his signature. The move is widely interpreted as a symbolic mockery intended to challenge Biden’s legitimacy and raise questions about his use of the autopen to sign official documents, a practice Trump has repeatedly criticized. White House insiders, speaking anonymously, confirmed that the decision originated with Trump, who has used the autopen dispute as a recurring line of attack on Biden’s cognitive fitness and autonomy. While critics warn that this gesture crosses norms of presidential decorum, supporters cite it as a provocative but effective political statement. The installation comes amid broader aesthetic changes Trump has made at the White House, such as redesigning the Rose Garden with stone paving, removing portraits of Democratic figures from prominent hallways, and integrating gold accents into decor. Media coverage suggests the snub escalates ongoing tensions between the two administrations and highlights Trump’s willingness to wield symbolic actions as political messaging.
Hour 2
Autism spectrum in adults has commonly overlooked symptoms, experts warn Many adults live with undiagnosed autism because their symptoms are subtle, misinterpreted, or masked, and experts are calling attention to the patterns that often evade detection. Social communication challenges stand out as central clues: difficulties understanding others’ perspectives, trouble navigating social rules, or a blunt, literal speaking style. Some adults struggle with forming friendships or experience discomfort in social settings, yet adapt by keeping to routines and structured habits to avoid chaos. Repetitive behaviors or deep, narrow interests—often dismissed as quirks—are additional indicators, alongside sensory sensitivities or strong emotional reactions to stimuli. One particularly common phenomenon is masking, where autistic individuals suppress overt traits to blend in socially; this can lead to exhaustion, anxiety, or a sense of inauthenticity over time. Experts caution that masking complicates diagnosis and often hides a person’s real needs. Autism presentations evolve across life stages, meaning traits may shift following transitions such as marriage, career changes, or parenthood. Women, especially, are often underdiagnosed because many cultivate better social coping skills or are socialized to hide their differences. Since symptoms vary widely and overlap with conditions like ADHD or anxiety, the article encourages adults who suspect they might be on the spectrum to seek evaluation from clinicians familiar with adult autism, and to be persistent—even when health systems are ill‑equipped to assess adults or have age‑related restrictions.
Special Guest: Ute Kruger
Dr Ute Krüger is a German-trained, Swedish-based pathology specialist with 25 years of professional experience. She has worked as a consultant physician at the Swedish hospitals in Växjö and Kalmar for the past 18 years, primarily as a breast cancer specialist. For four years she also served as medical
director of the pathology department in Växjö. During the last eight years of her career as a pathologist, she was involved in breast cancer research at the University of Lund alongside her clinical work at Kalmar Hospital. This resulted in several publications.
In the autumn of 2021, she noticed changes in the daily clinical examinations that seemed to be related to the coronavirus ‘vaccinations’. She then coined the term ‘turbo cancer’. In recent years, she has been in close contact and exchange with colleagues worldwide regarding changes after corona ‘vaccination’. She has helped to publish the novel findings after coronavirus ‘vaccinations’ made by Prof Burkhardt and Prof Lang in the book ‘Vaccinated – dead’ (www.histo-atlas.com).
Due to the lack of response to her findings, she resigned from her position. She could not in an honest and sincere way continue to work as a pathologist in a system where the focus clearly is not on the health of patients. After several years of further training, she now works in her own holistic medical practice, specialising in disease prevention (www.active-health.se).
Welcome back to another “Homeopathic Hits” episode on The Robert Scott Bell Show!
On The Robert Scott Bell Show today, we turn to Niccolum Sulphuricum—the sulphate of nickel in homeopathic potency. In crude form, nickel salts can irritate the stomach, liver, and skin.
Potentized, this remedy addresses digestive sluggishness, gastric irritation, and headaches linked to liver strain or poor nutrition.
Download the Information Sheet
Stop Hemp‑Killing Language in Congress Congress is considering redefining hemp in a way that would outlaw more than 95% of currently legal hemp products, according to the U.S. Hemp Roundtable, which argues this change would decimate the industry. The initiative, labeled “hemp‑killing language,” is being inserted into the Farm Bill and appropriations measures, and could criminalize hemp derivatives that contain any detectable THC. The campaign outlines that this drastic redefinition would undo years of progress by farmers, entrepreneurs, and regulatory frameworks that have supported a thriving hemp and CBD marketplace. Advocates warn that smaller producers, particularly in emerging sectors like hemp extract and cannabidiol (CBD), would be disproportionately harmed. The group is urging citizens to contact their congressional representatives to oppose the amendment and instead support rational regulation that ensures safety without shutting down legal markets. They cite prior legislative attempts where similar language was introduced, sometimes stripped out, and encourage vigilance as Congress debates “minibus” spending packages and Farm Bill provisions. Recent updates suggest that the Senate’s agriculture appropriations bill removed the most egregious provisions, but advocates maintain that the threat remains as legislative negotiations continue.
Ep. 2694 In a World of Lies, What Health Advice Do You Trust? Dr. Robert Scott Bell joins Tom Woods to explore how people can discern credible health guidance in an era of misinformation, politicization, and conflicting agendas. They argue that much of modern health advice comes filtered through institutional biases—government agencies, pharmaceutical companies, and mainstream media—and encourage listeners to instead cultivate skepticism by examining evidence, questioning authority, and favoring independent or alternative sources when the official narrative fails transparency. Bell draws from his years in functional and integrative medicine to illustrate how prevailing paradigms often discount root‑cause approaches in favor of symptom suppression. He criticizes the tendency for regulatory bodies to conflate correlation with causation, to shut down dissenting voices, or to label dissent “misinformation.” The episode discusses examples such as vaccine safety debates, COVID‑19 policy shifts, and nutritional dogma, urging clinicians and patients alike to demand open data, raw trial results, and regulatory accountability. They emphasize the importance of healing environments, the role of the microbiome, personalized care versus one‑size‑fits‑all protocols, and the need to resist reductive thinking. Ultimately, the message is that returning agency to individuals—empowering them to vet sources, hold experts accountable, and think critically—is essential to restoring trust and integrity in health discourse.
Remember Friends, The Power to Heal is Yours!
