Feb 24, 2026 3-5pm ET
Tuesday on The Robert Scott Bell Show:
Hour 1
No Immunity for Glyphosate Act: Bipartisan Bill Would Block Trump Executive Order A bipartisan bill introduced in Congress on February 19, 2026, titled the No Immunity for Glyphosate Act (NIGA), seeks to prevent President Trump from granting legal immunity to glyphosate manufacturers under the Defense Production Act (DPA) through a recent executive order designating glyphosate production as critical to national defense and agricultural security. The legislation, sponsored by Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and co-sponsored by Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) along with several other Republicans and Democrats, would explicitly prohibit the use of DPA authority to shield pesticide companies from civil liability, product liability claims, or environmental lawsuits related to glyphosate-based herbicides such as Roundup, ensuring that existing legal avenues for holding manufacturers accountable remain open despite national security designations. The bill responds to widespread concern following Trump’s February 18, 2026, executive order invoking the DPA to prioritize domestic glyphosate and elemental phosphorus production, citing risks of foreign dependency on these materials for military readiness, semiconductor manufacturing, lithium-ion batteries, and food supply chains, while providing compliance immunity under Section 707 for companies fulfilling federal directives. Critics argue the order effectively insulates Bayer (owner of Monsanto since 2018) and other producers from ongoing multibillion-dollar litigation over glyphosate’s alleged carcinogenicity, with more than 165,000 lawsuits filed and billions already paid in settlements after juries found the chemical caused non-Hodgkin lymphoma in multiple high-profile cases. The International Agency for Research on Cancer classifies glyphosate as “probably carcinogenic to humans,” supported by animal studies showing rare, aggressive cancers at regulatory-approved doses, while U.S. EPA assessments maintain it is not likely carcinogenic when used according to label directions, creating ongoing scientific and legal controversy. Proponents of the bill, including Children’s Health Defense and environmental groups, contend that national defense classifications should not override public health protections or judicial findings, warning that immunity could discourage safer alternatives, reduce corporate incentive for reformulation, and expose farmers, consumers, and ecosystems to continued risk from a widely used herbicide linked to soil degradation, pollinator decline, and resistant superweeds. The bipartisan sponsorship signals cross-aisle recognition of the issue’s importance beyond partisan lines, with Gaetz emphasizing that “national security should not be a blank check for corporate immunity when lives are at stake.” The article notes that while the executive order aims to secure domestic supply amid global trade uncertainties, it has sparked backlash from health advocates and some agricultural stakeholders who fear it prioritizes industry protection over independent scientific review and litigation accountability. The No Immunity for Glyphosate Act would amend the DPA to carve out explicit exceptions for pesticide-related liabilities, ensuring that emergency production mandates do not preempt state tort laws or federal court judgments. Passage remains uncertain given the administration’s support for the executive action and industry lobbying, but the bill highlights growing congressional pushback against perceived overreach in blending national security with corporate liability shields for controversial chemicals.
A Message to the MAHA Community The Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) community faces internal tension following President Trump’s February 18, 2026, executive order invoking the Defense Production Act to designate domestic production of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides as national defense priorities, prompting some supporters to express outrage over perceived protection of a chemical linked to health risks while others view it as necessary supply chain security. The MAHA Report addresses this division by publishing Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s full February 22, 2026, X post explaining his nuanced stance, emphasizing that pesticides are toxic by design and that glyphosate exposure poses real risks, evidenced by billions in cancer settlements, elevated disease rates in agricultural communities, and IARC’s probable carcinogen classification, yet abruptly eliminating glyphosate would devastate crop yields, spike food prices, and threaten farm viability given decades of policy locking agriculture into chemical dependence. Kennedy supports the order’s goal of reducing reliance on adversarial nations like China for critical inputs essential to defense and food security, while committing HHS to accelerate regenerative agriculture, next-generation technologies including laser-guided weeding, electrothermal/electrical systems, robotics, precision cultivation, and biological controls to transition away from synthetic chemicals without destabilizing the supply chain. He stresses collaboration with USDA and EPA to expedite EPA review incorporating independent science, phase out problematic inputs through innovation, and support farmers during transition. A February 20, 2026, MAHA Action memo clarifies the order does not grant blanket immunity from cancer lawsuits—Section 707 provides narrow compliance-based protection only for actions directly required by federal directives, not overriding ongoing litigation or product liability claims—and does not mandate glyphosate use, ban alternatives, or prevent state/federal regulation. It acknowledges glyphosate’s harms, dependency risks, and supply vulnerabilities (only one U.S. producer, heavy Chinese imports), while outlining a path forward: independent EPA review, scaling biological herbicides, robotic weeding (e.g., Kansas systems), electrothermal control (UK/U.S. expansion), and precision mechanical cultivation to reduce chemical reliance cost-effectively. The memo calls for urgency in innovation, rejecting overnight elimination that would harm farmers and families, and positions MAHA as pursuing complementary goals of national security and health security through practical, science-based reform rather than disruption. The article reassures the community that anger is valid but urges focus on facts over spin, emphasizing that MAHA seeks long-term systemic change—rebuilding soil health, biodiversity, and resilience—while navigating inherited dependencies without economic catastrophe.
Don’t Let a Misread Executive Order Split MAHA The article urges the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) community to avoid division over President Trump’s February 18, 2026, Executive Order invoking the Defense Production Act (DPA) to prioritize domestic production of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides, clarifying that widespread claims of the order granting blanket immunity to glyphosate manufacturers from cancer lawsuits or product liability are inaccurate and based on misreading the law. The order designates these materials as critical to national defense and agricultural productivity due to supply chain vulnerabilities (heavy reliance on foreign sources, particularly China, and only one U.S. producer for elemental phosphorus), delegating prioritization authority to the Secretary of Agriculture to ensure adequate supply for military readiness, semiconductor manufacturing, lithium-ion batteries, and food security. Critics have interpreted Section 707 of the DPA (50 U.S.C. 4557), which provides immunity for acts or failures to act resulting directly or indirectly from compliance with a government order under the Act, as shielding Bayer/Monsanto from ongoing Roundup litigation involving non-Hodgkin lymphoma claims. The author counters that this protection is narrow and strictly compliance-based: it applies only to consequences arising from obeying specific DPA directives, such as prioritizing production over other contracts or reallocating resources for national security needs, not to general manufacturing, labeling, warnings, design defects, negligence, or exposure harms unrelated to compliance. The statute requires a clear causal link—”show the chain”—between the alleged injury and DPA-mandated actions; routine glyphosate production or sales do not qualify for immunity. The piece stresses that the order does not rewrite product liability law, ban alternatives, mandate glyphosate use, or prevent EPA reevaluation, state regulations, or existing lawsuits, which continue unaffected. RFK Jr.’s public statement acknowledging glyphosate’s toxicity and embedded role in agriculture—while opposing abrupt elimination that would spike food prices and harm farmers—aligns with this interpretation, focusing on gradual transition via regenerative methods rather than overnight bans. The author warns that viral misrepresentations (“this EO makes Bayer immune from cancer lawsuits”) risk self-sabotage by allowing critics to portray MAHA as alarmist or uninformed, distracting from legitimate concerns about chemical dependency, supply vulnerabilities, and the need for innovation in weed control. Instead, energy should target courts, agencies, and policy for accountability. The tone is pragmatic and cautionary, calling for factual accuracy to sustain momentum: test claims rigorously, oppose the order on its actual merits (propping up problematic systems), and avoid panic that undermines credibility. The article concludes that unity in MAHA requires distinguishing real policy implications from exaggerated fears, ensuring the movement advances health sovereignty through informed advocacy rather than reactive division.
A Single 3g Dose of Beetroot Extract Significantly Improves Cognitive Performance in Healthy AdultsA randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial published in the European Journal of Nutrition showed that a single 3-gram oral dose of beetroot extract standardized to 2.5% nitrates (providing approximately 75 mg of dietary nitrates) produced statistically significant acute enhancements in multiple domains of cognitive function among 24 healthy young adults aged 18–35 years. Participants completed a comprehensive computerized battery including the Stroop color-word interference test, N-back working memory tasks (1-back and 2-back), choice reaction time assessments, and rapid visual information processing measures 2–3 hours after ingestion on separate test days at least one week apart. Key findings included faster reaction times on incongruent Stroop trials (p < 0.05), fewer errors and higher accuracy in the 2-back task (p < 0.01), improved overall task performance accuracy across executive function and attention measures (p < 0.05), and moderate to large effect sizes (Cohen’s d ranging 0.5–0.9) without corresponding changes in subjective mood, fatigue, or cardiovascular parameters such as blood pressure or heart rate. Plasma nitrate and nitrite concentrations rose significantly from baseline, peaking around 2 hours post-ingestion and confirming effective nitrate absorption and sequential reduction to nitric oxide, which is thought to mediate the cognitive effects primarily through increased cerebral blood flow, enhanced neurovascular coupling, improved mitochondrial bioenergetics in neurons, and reduced oxidative stress in brain regions supporting executive control, working memory, and attentional processes. The acute onset of benefits aligns with the known pharmacokinetics of dietary nitrates, distinguishing this work from chronic supplementation studies that often report sustained vascular and exercise performance improvements alongside more gradual cognitive gains. No adverse events were reported, and the extract was well-tolerated, suggesting potential utility as a natural, non-stimulant cognitive enhancer for acute demands such as academic performance, high-stakes decision-making, or cognitively demanding work and sports. The authors note that while the sample size was modest and restricted to healthy young adults, the crossover design enhanced statistical power and controlled for individual variability. Broader implications include possible applications for age-related cognitive decline prevention, fatigue resistance during prolonged mental effort, and complementary support in populations with suboptimal nitric oxide bioavailability, though longer-duration trials are needed to evaluate sustained effects, optimal dosing regimens, and safety in diverse groups including older adults or those with metabolic conditions. The study adds to accumulating evidence that nitrate-rich plant foods and extracts can offer rapid, accessible brain benefits via nitric oxide pathways, providing a dietary alternative or adjunct to traditional nootropics.
Mineral Deficiencies Are Silently Undermining Global Health Widespread deficiencies in essential minerals such as magnesium, zinc, selenium, iodine, iron, copper, manganese, and chromium are silently driving epidemics of chronic disease, metabolic dysfunction, immune compromise, and cognitive decline across populations worldwide, with modern agricultural practices, soil depletion, food processing, and reliance on ultra-processed diets stripping foods of bioavailable nutrients and creating a hidden malnutrition crisis that conventional medicine largely overlooks in favor of pharmaceutical symptom management. The article highlights that magnesium deficiency affects an estimated 50–80% of people in developed nations due to depleted soils, high pesticide use, and excessive consumption of refined grains, sugar, and alcohol that deplete stores, contributing to insulin resistance, hypertension, arrhythmias, migraines, anxiety, depression, muscle cramps, fatigue, and increased cardiovascular mortality risk, as magnesium is critical for over 300 enzymatic reactions including ATP production, glucose metabolism, and nervous system regulation. Zinc deficiency, prevalent in up to 17% of the global population and higher in vegetarians/vegans due to phytate interference, impairs immune function, wound healing, taste/smell perception, growth in children, and testosterone production in men, while also linking to higher susceptibility to infections, autoimmune conditions, and accelerated aging through reduced antioxidant enzyme activity. Selenium shortages, exacerbated by low-selenium soils in regions like parts of China, Europe, and New Zealand, reduce glutathione peroxidase activity, weakening defenses against oxidative stress, viral replication (notably increasing severity of viral illnesses), thyroid hormone conversion, and cancer risk, with studies showing inverse correlations between selenium status and incidence of prostate, lung, and colorectal cancers. Iodine deficiency persists as the leading preventable cause of intellectual disability globally despite salt iodization programs, with inadequate intake in pregnancy linked to lower IQ, cretinism, and developmental delays, while subclinical deficiency contributes to hypothyroidism, goiter, fibrocystic breast disease, and higher breast cancer rates. Iron deficiency anemia remains the most common nutritional disorder worldwide, particularly affecting women of reproductive age, children, and vegetarians, leading to fatigue, cognitive impairment, poor school performance, and increased maternal/fetal complications, though excessive iron from fortified foods or supplements can promote oxidative damage and infection risk. Deficiencies in trace minerals like copper (needed for iron utilization and connective tissue), manganese (antioxidant enzyme cofactor), and chromium (glucose metabolism enhancer) further compound metabolic and neurological issues, with chromium inadequacy implicated in insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes progression. The article attributes the crisis to industrial farming’s focus on yield over nutrient density, monoculture depleting soil minerals, glyphosate chelating metals and disrupting microbial activity, and diets dominated by calorie-dense but micronutrient-poor processed foods, urging a return to regenerative agriculture, mineral-rich whole foods, targeted supplementation under guidance, and soil remineralization to restore nutrient density. It warns that ignoring these deficiencies perpetuates pharmaceutical dependency for conditions that are often preventable or reversible through nutritional correction, calling for greater awareness and policy shifts to prioritize soil health and food quality over chemical-intensive production.
Welcome back to another “Homeopathic Hits” episode on The Robert Scott Bell Show!
On The Robert Scott Bell Show today, we highlight Antimonium Sulphuratum Auratum — Golden Sulphuret of Antimony.
Boericke presents this remedy as especially valuable in chronic nasal and bronchial catarrh, marked by persistent mucus production, roughness of mucous membranes, and difficult respiration. Its sphere extends to pustular acne and even amaurosis.
Download the Information Sheet
Hour 2
Are the ‘Liberals’ of Today Really Liberals? Contemporary individuals and institutions that self-identify as liberal have largely abandoned the classical liberal principles of individual liberty, free speech, limited government, tolerance of dissent, and skepticism toward concentrated power, instead adopting an authoritarian posture that enforces ideological conformity, suppresses opposing views, and expands state or institutional control over personal behavior, language, and thought under the banner of progress and protection. The article traces the historical meaning of liberalism from its Latin root “liber” (free), through Enlightenment emphasis on reason, individual rights, and freedom from arbitrary rule, to 19th-century political philosophy advocating minimal government interference in personal and economic life to maximize human potential. It contrasts this foundation with modern practices that include widespread censorship on digital platforms, deplatforming of dissenting scientists and journalists, enforcement of speech codes on campuses, cancellation campaigns against nonconformists, and support for mandates that override bodily autonomy and parental rights, all justified as necessary to combat misinformation, hate, or harm. The author invokes Aleksandr Dugin’s concept of “liberal totalitarianism” as an internal contradiction where liberalism, once the ideology of emancipation, morphs into a system demanding absolute allegiance to progressive dogmas, using Orwellian doublethink to reconcile claims of defending freedom with actions that restrict it—such as labeling dissent as violence while employing coercive tactics to silence it. Linguistic manipulation plays a central role, with terms like “disinformation,” “hate speech,” and “safety” redefined to justify suppression, echoing Orwell’s Newspeak in 1984, which limits thought by narrowing language and punishing “thoughtcrime.” Specific examples include coordinated efforts to remove content questioning official Covid narratives, opposition to voter identification laws despite broad public support, and policies criminalizing silent prayer or peaceful protest near certain facilities in Western democracies. The piece argues that true liberalism, as exemplified by George Orwell—a democratic socialist who fiercely opposed totalitarianism in all forms—prioritizes open debate, individual conscience, and resistance to power abuses, yet today’s dominant liberal strain inverts these values by prioritizing group identity, equity outcomes, and expert consensus over personal freedom and empirical challenge. This transformation, accelerated by the 2008 financial crisis and especially the Covid response, reflects a shift from liberalism as a bulwark against tyranny to a new orthodoxy that views dissent as existential threat, employing mechanisms of social, economic, and legal punishment to enforce compliance. The author concludes that the label “liberal” has been hollowed out through aspect-perception shift (Wittgenstein’s duck-rabbit illusion), where the same actions once seen as illiberal are now perceived as virtuous defense of marginalized groups or public safety, requiring observers to consciously reject the redefinition and reclaim the original commitment to liberty, tolerance, and limited authority. The essay calls for recognizing this inversion as a betrayal of liberalism’s founding ethos and urges principled defense of free inquiry and individual rights against the emerging illiberal consensus masquerading as progressive enlightenment.
Parents’ Gut Feeling About Sick Child Often Correct, Study FindsParents’ instinctive sense that their child is seriously ill during an episode of sickness accurately predicts the need for hospital admission or intensive medical intervention far more reliably than many standardized clinical tools or isolated vital sign abnormalities, according to a systematic review and meta-analysis published in Archives of Disease in Childhood that pooled data from 30 high-quality studies encompassing over 25,000 children evaluated in emergency departments, primary care clinics, pediatric wards, and pre-hospital settings across multiple high-income countries. When parents articulated a strong “gut feeling” of serious concern—described as an intuitive worry disproportionate to visible symptoms, measurable parameters, or the child’s usual behavior—the odds of the child requiring hospital admission rose substantially, with a pooled odds ratio of 4.5 (95% confidence interval 3.1–6.6) compared to cases where parents expressed no such concern, and the positive predictive value for serious outcomes such as sepsis, severe dehydration necessitating intravenous fluids, respiratory failure requiring oxygen or ventilation, or other life-threatening conditions reached 68%. This parental intuition remained a significant independent predictor even after statistical adjustment for age, comorbidities, clinician-assessed severity scores including Pediatric Early Warning Score variants and National Early Warning Score adaptations for pediatrics, fever duration, and other objective markers. The review incorporated prospective cohort studies, diagnostic accuracy evaluations, and qualitative reports, consistently demonstrating that parents’ prolonged, intimate observation of subtle deviations—changes in interaction, cry quality, skin color or mottling, feeding patterns, sleepiness, or responsiveness—often precedes detectable physiological deterioration by hours, providing an early warning signal that complements rather than duplicates clinical data. Healthcare providers are urged to treat parental concern as a critical “red flag” warranting heightened vigilance, senior consultation, additional investigations, or admission for close monitoring, particularly in young infants or cases with nonspecific presentations such as unexplained fever, lethargy, poor feeding, or irritability where initial examinations may appear reassuring. The findings align with longstanding clinical guidance that parents are the most reliable experts on their child’s baseline and deviations from it, and dismissing or undervaluing this input risks delayed recognition of conditions that can progress rapidly in children. Limitations include variability in how “gut feeling” was operationalized across studies, potential publication bias toward positive associations, and predominance of observational designs without randomized trials testing systematic integration of parental intuition into decision protocols. The authors recommend future research to develop and validate combined clinical-parental assessment tools that leverage this subjective expertise to improve triage precision, reduce missed serious illness, and avoid unnecessary admissions. Overall, the evidence reinforces the practical value of actively soliciting and heeding parental instinct in pediatric care, suggesting it serves as a low-cost, high-yield safeguard against underestimating illness severity in vulnerable young patients.
The next Hollywood hero? Jay Bhattacharya NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya, a former Stanford professor known for co-authoring the Great Barrington Declaration that advocated focused protection over broad lockdowns during the Covid-19 pandemic, has emerged as a central figure in the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement under HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., positioning him as a potential cultural icon for those disillusioned with mainstream public health institutions and eager for reform. Bhattacharya’s rapid rise from academic critic of lockdown policies—where he argued that prolonged restrictions caused disproportionate harm to children, the poor, and working-class communities while failing to meaningfully curb viral spread—to leading the nation’s premier biomedical research agency reflects a broader shift in public health leadership toward skepticism of centralized mandates, emphasis on individual risk assessment, and prioritization of chronic disease prevention over infectious disease alarmism. At a January 30, 2026, MAHA Institute roundtable titled “Reclaiming Science: The People’s NIH,” Bhattacharya outlined plans for a “second scientific revolution,” including a PubMed “replication button” to flag studies needing independent verification, dedicated funding for reproducibility efforts, a Real World Data Platform for transparent access to federal health datasets, and a pivot at NIAID away from biodefense toward addressing infectious and immunological diseases in everyday populations. He declared gain-of-function research on wild pathogens “absolute fantasy” and confirmed its termination under the administration, while committing to higher evidentiary standards, repurposed drugs, nutrition-focused research, and affordable treatments. The article portrays Bhattacharya as a charismatic, soft-spoken figure whose humility—admitting scientific community ethical failures during Covid—and willingness to engage critics have earned him admiration from MAHA supporters, who see him as embodying the movement’s call for transparency, accountability, and patient-centered science. His appointment has drawn sharp criticism from legacy health organizations and Democratic lawmakers who view him as insufficiently credentialed in administrative leadership and overly sympathetic to anti-vaccine perspectives, yet his public appearances, including on podcasts and at conferences, have cultivated a growing fanbase that likens his story to a redemption arc for scientific dissenters. The piece speculates that Bhattacharya’s visibility could translate into broader cultural influence, potentially inspiring documentaries, books, or even fictional portrayals that frame him as a principled outsider challenging entrenched interests, much like previous figures who transitioned from controversy to celebrated reform icons. While acknowledging the polarized reception—supporters praise his courage and critics decry his role in rolling back vaccine recommendations—Politico suggests Bhattacharya’s trajectory may make him one of the most consequential and polarizing health figures of the decade, with implications for NIH funding priorities, regulatory culture, and public trust in science under the current administration.
Urgent: Glyphosate Detox – Safely Eliminate the Plant Nerve Agent From Your Body Glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup and other widely used herbicides, functions as a systemic plant nerve agent that disrupts the shikimate pathway in plants and gut bacteria in humans, leading to widespread bioaccumulation linked to gut dysbiosis, leaky gut, inflammation, neurological issues, hormone disruption, cancer risk, and metabolic disorders, with studies showing detectable levels in over 80% of urine samples from U.S. adults and children despite regulatory claims of rapid excretion. The article presents an urgent detox protocol to safely mobilize and eliminate stored glyphosate from tissues, emphasizing that abrupt cessation of exposure alone is insufficient because the chemical binds to proteins, fats, and minerals, requiring targeted nutritional and lifestyle strategies to support liver detoxification, kidney excretion, gut restoration, and chelation-like removal. Core recommendations include immediately switching to 100% organic, non-GMO foods to halt new intake, as conventional grains, legumes, and produce remain primary exposure sources due to pre-harvest desiccation practices. Daily consumption of sulfur-rich foods such as garlic, onions, cruciferous vegetables (broccoli, cauliflower, Brussels sprouts, kale), and eggs supports phase II liver detoxification pathways, particularly glutathione conjugation that binds and neutralizes glyphosate metabolites. High-dose cilantro, chlorella, and activated charcoal are advised as natural binders to trap and escort glyphosate out via stool, with cilantro taken on an empty stomach followed by chlorella 30 minutes later to prevent reabsorption, and charcoal used sparingly to avoid nutrient depletion. Sauna therapy, infrared or traditional, promotes sweating as a major elimination route for lipophilic toxins, with 20–40 minute sessions 3–5 times weekly combined with hydration and electrolyte replenishment. Supporting liver function involves milk thistle (silymarin), N-acetylcysteine (NAC) to boost glutathione, and dandelion root or burdock for bile flow and kidney support. Mineral repletion addresses glyphosate’s chelation of essential metals: magnesium (glycinate or threonate), zinc (picolinate), selenium (selenomethionine), manganese, and boron help displace and replace displaced minerals while aiding enzyme function. Probiotics, particularly soil-based organisms and strains like Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Bifidobacterium longum, restore glyphosate-damaged microbiota, while fermented foods (sauerkraut, kimchi) and prebiotic fibers (inulin, resistant starch) rebuild diversity. The protocol stresses hydration (3–4 liters daily of filtered water), exercise to mobilize fat-stored toxins, and avoidance of additional exposures from non-stick cookware, personal care products, and contaminated water. The author warns against rapid detox without support, as mobilizing stored glyphosate too quickly can cause Herxheimer-like reactions including fatigue, brain fog, joint pain, or skin rashes, recommending gradual implementation over weeks to months under practitioner guidance if severe symptoms exist. The article frames glyphosate as a persistent environmental toxin requiring proactive personal action given regulatory inaction and industry influence, urging readers to prioritize organic living, soil health advocacy, and community education to reduce collective exposure.Question of The Day!
Hi guys, I wish you would go live on x again. I miss watching you there. I used to save the link to watch later but can’t find it anymore. Died Suddenly posted it for a little while and I caught you on that link a couple times but then it stopped. I wanted to ask you what is the name of that supplement you mentioned to detoxify glyphosate…That is something everyone should be using. Please reply the name of the supplement for glyphosate detox and where to get it. I got your email about the eye health docuclass from Jonathan Landsman and shared it on x and FB. I already saw it but will watch it again. I am on his email list and he always repeats his docuclasses all very good.
Pam
Hello – I have been listening to your show on and off for under a year and really enjoy it. I would love to learn more about the power to heal and stay healthy. However, some of the health products that you mention on your show are things that I’m not familiar with but would like to be. Can you recommend any books or other resources to get up to speed? Thank you! P.S. Best of luck on your burpee challenge, after that you should also do your show while riding an exercise bike like your mom 💪
Kristin
Remember Friends, The Power to Heal is Yours!
