February 10, 2025 3-5pm ET
Monday on The Robert Scott Bell Show:
Scientific Report of the 2025 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee The 2025 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee has submitted its scientific report to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), marking the next step in revising national dietary recommendations. The report provides evidence-based assessments of Americans’ dietary patterns, chronic health conditions, and the role of nutrition across different life stages. Key findings emphasize the rising prevalence of diet-related diseases, including obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular conditions, and call for a stronger emphasis on nutrient-dense diets, reduced processed food consumption, and culturally responsive dietary interventions. The committee highlights the impact of sugar-sweetened beverages, saturated fats, and ultra-processed foods on public health and underscores the importance of meal timing, portion control, and dietary patterns in disease prevention. The report also includes data on food group consumption trends and nutrient deficiencies across demographics. A 60-day public comment period is open, allowing individuals and organizations to provide feedback before the final dietary guidelines are released. The report serves as the foundation for policy updates affecting federal nutrition programs, food labeling standards, and public health initiatives.
FULL DISCLOSURE: Assessing Conflicts of Interest of the 2025 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee The 2025 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee report outlines dietary recommendations based on scientific evidence, yet concerns over potential conflicts of interest have surfaced. Critics argue that corporate food industry ties may have influenced the committee’s findings, particularly in areas concerning processed foods, sugar consumption, and agricultural subsidies. Previous advisory committees have faced scrutiny over connections to major food and beverage corporations, leading to questions about transparency and independence in shaping federal nutrition policies. The report calls for greater accountability and disclosure of financial ties between committee members and industry stakeholders to ensure public trust in dietary guidelines. Advocates for reform emphasize the need for a more diverse representation of independent researchers, nutritionists, and public health professionals without corporate affiliations. With the USDA and HHS accepting public comments until 11:59 PM ET tonight, individuals and organizations have an opportunity to weigh in on the committee’s recommendations and ethical considerations. The final guidelines, expected later this year, will impact federal food assistance programs, public health initiatives, and nutritional education efforts nationwide. The debate underscores the broader issue of balancing scientific integrity with industry influence in shaping national health policies.
Submit a Comment to the Departments | Dietary Guidelines for Americans The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) have opened a 60-day publiccomment period, which began on December 11, 2024, and will close on February 10, 2025. This comment period allows the public to provide feedback on the Scientific Report of the 2025 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, which will inform the development of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025-2030. The public was also invited to present oral comments at a virtual meeting held on January 16, 2025, with a recording of the meeting expected to be posted within two weeks. To submit a comment electronically, individuals can visit Regulations.gov and search for docket number HHS-OASH-2024-0017, then click on the “Comment” box. Written submissions can be sent via mail to the Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (ODPHP) at HHS. All submitted comments are reviewed before posting, and duplicate submissions are discouraged. The government encourages strong public engagement in shaping the dietary guidelines, which will impact federal nutrition programs, public health initiatives, and food industry regulations.
Special Guest Brian Festa
Brian Festa is a Civil Rights Attorney who, along with his business partner and friend Dawn Jolly, founded We The Patriots USA to preserve and reclaim our God-given inalienable rights. With 15 years of experience working in state government, Brian has investigated, mediated, and/or prosecuted cases of discrimination in the workplace, housing, and places of public accommodation. Brian also conducted thousands of hearings as an administrative hearing officer for the labor department prior to working as a civil rights attorney. Brian is a father of two who first became involved in health freedom activism and legal work several years ago, after his son was seriously injured by a vaccine, resulting in lifelong disabilities. Brian travels throughout the nation to speak about the work of We The Patriots USA, including multiple appearances at Clay Clark’s Reawaken America Tour. Brian has also been a guest on dozens of broadcasts, including The Glenn Beck Program, The Charlie Kirk Show, The Steve Deace Show, Conservative Review with Daniel Horowitz, Steve Bannon’s War Room, Infowars, and The Health Ranger Report with Mike Adams.
WTP USA Saves Baby from Medical Kidnapping in CT A Connecticut mother successfully defended her parental rights against state intervention after refusing routine vaccinations for her infant, thanks to legalassistance from We The Patriots USA (WTP USA). The mother, Mary Prescott, recounted how the Connecticut Department of Children and Families (DCF) was alerted after she declined vaccines at her child’s three-month appointment and subsequently missed a scheduled visit. The pediatrician’s office reported her to DCF, prompting a social worker to insist on a home inspection. Fearful that her baby could be removed from her custody, she initially felt pressured to comply. However, after consulting with WTP USA, she was provided with legal representation, which resulted in a strongly worded letter to DCF asserting her rights. Following this intervention, DCF dropped the case, and she received no further contact from the agency. Prescott credited WTP USA’s legal support with safeguarding her family from what she described as coercion and medical overreach. The organization has pledged to continue fighting against what it calls “medical kidnapping,” advocating for informed consent and parental rights. The case highlights ongoing legal battles over vaccination policies and the role of government agencies in medical decision-making.
Welcome back to another “Homeopathic Hits” episode on The Robert Scott Bell Show!
Today, we’re spotlighting Malva Sylvestris, a homeopathic remedy valued for its respiratory support, digestive soothing, and skin-calming effects.
If you’re dealing with chronic cough, inflamed mucous membranes, or irritated skin, Malva Sylvestris offers a natural, gentle approach to relief.
Download the Information Sheet
Hour 2
Not All Children Respond to Vaccinations the Same Research by Dr. Michael Pichichero and his team challenges the assumption that all children respond uniformly to vaccines, identifying significant variability in immune responses. Analyzing 499 infants, they found that 11% were “low responders” (LVR), producing subprotective antibody levels to at least four out of six vaccine antigens, with 50% showing low responses to seven other vaccines. These children exhibited an immune profile described as a “prolonged neonatal-like immune profile,” indicating delayed immune system maturation. A follow-up study categorized children into four response groups: very low vaccine responders (vLVR), LVR, normal vaccine responders (NVR), and high vaccine responders (HVR). Results showed that vaccine responsiveness tended to persist over time, meaning children who were vLVR after primary vaccinations remained so before and after booster shots. Environmental and demographic factors played a role, with African American/multiracial children being less frequently vLVR, while antibiotic use and daycare attendance correlated with lower vaccine responsiveness. Additionally, low responders experienced more antibiotic-treated bacterial infections, suggesting a link between vaccine response and susceptibility to illness. These findings emphasize the need for a more individualized approach to vaccination, considering genetic, environmental, and health-related factors to optimize immunization effectiveness.
How Industrial Dairy Industry Corrupts Health Benefits of Milk The industrial dairy industry has significantly altered the natural composition of milk by introducing “rumen-protected fats,” which bypass cows’ naturaldigestion processes, increasing polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) content while reducing beneficial saturated fats by up to 20%. Traditionally, dairy fats have been linked to positive effects on cardiovascular health, metabolism, and lean body mass, but modern feeding practices using industrial oilseeds such as soy, cottonseed, and canola are disrupting the fatty acid balance. Studies show that cows fed with these high-PUFA diets produce milk with altered fat profiles, increasing oxidation risks and reducing the stability of dairy fats. The shift away from nature’s design stems from decades of dietary misinformation vilifying saturated fats, favoring unsaturated alternatives that benefit industrial food and pharmaceutical interests. Researchers warn that modifying dairy’s fat profile for commercial purposes has unintended consequences for human health, emphasizing that natural dairy fats have historically provided essential nutrients without the risks associated with industrial seed oils. The push to manipulate dairy fats is part of a broader trend to engineer foods based on outdated nutritional theories rather than nature’s optimal design, raising concerns about the long-term health impact of these changes.
How fast is your gut? Why the answer is important for your health Gut transit time, the speed at which food moves through the digestive tract, plays a crucial role in overall health. A study reveals that gut transit time varies widely, ranging from 12 to 73 hours, with an average of 23-24 hours. Slow gut transit can lead to bloating, constipation, and an imbalance in gut bacteria, causing increased production of toxic gases and inflammation. On the other hand, fast gut transit is often linked to conditions such as anxiety, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), leading to nutrient malabsorption and dehydration. Gut microbiome composition significantly influences motility, as the bacteria present aid in breaking down food and producing metabolites that regulate digestion. Researchers suggest a simple at-home test, the “sweetcorn test,” to assess gut motility—monitoring how long it takes for undigested corn kernels to appear in stool. If food passes in less than 12 hours, the gut is fast; if it takes more than 48 hours, it is slow. Individuals with slow motility are advised to increase fiber intake, hydration, and exercise, while those with excessively fast transit should seek medical evaluation. The findings highlight the importance of dietary and lifestyle adjustments to maintain a healthy digestive system.
Question Of The Day!
Dear Robert and Super D,
My husband now has a stent in one of the main arteries to his heart to repair a 95% blockage. (That’s why we were not present at the January AMA.) The cardiologist who inserted the stent offered to include my husband as a new patient. A second heart artery has a 65% blockage which will be addressed within 6 months while his body adjusts to having a foreign body within his heart artery. Meanwhile, the cardiologist has prescribed 5 medications, and has asked him not to take any supplements, especially ones with metal (even if they are plant based!). He cannot have grapefruit because of the statin he is now taking. He is no longer taking hawthorn berry because of its potential impact on the heart. (That I discovered by contacting the company which makes the hawthorn berry capsules.) Taking no metals leaves out Copper and Silver Hydrosol, among others like magnesium. He is only taking Cardio Miracle once a day instead of twice, which he had been doing for over 3 years. My husband has now contracted a cold and is sneezing, coughing, with runny and stuffy nose. Prior to his cardio event, we would have increased the silver and would have taken echinacea, zinc, vitamins C, D, E, and B. How does one subdue the common cold under these circumstances? He eats an orange every day, and we will be having lots of homemade chicken soup until the cold is gone. Is there anything else that we can do to shorten the duration and the strength of this cold?
Doreen




